Brilliant HG.
Makes it so clear.
Doesn’t it seem strange that the pre release snippets from the Oprah event seem to demonstrate MM does actually know what the problem is?
She seems to be flailing around blaming everyone. BP HMTQ Kate and William the press the British people. And yet they chose to leave coz they didn’t get what they wanted half in half out deal. It seems so weird how the narrative seems to change all the time. We want privacy. Then appear for 2 hrs on TV in USA?? What’s that about?
How will this end?
1. Compartmentalisation.
2. The need to control in the NOW.
This is what causes the inconsistent (from your perspective) behaviour. The narcissist is blind to it.
It’s interesting that she thought the Royal family had not acted to protect her as we can see them now removing all protections by allowing an investigation to go ahead into alleged bullying accusations. It’s more likely, in that instance if proven, they protected her too much.
WOW, Violetta! That could potentially make sense to some people, but it would be stretching the ordinary imagination of most people to go there. You have to wonder what made the former editor suggest that. I’m not sure being an unaware mid-range narc that Meghan Markle could orchestrate such a complex narrative, and I’m not sure what the editor is basing that on. Was it prior to or after the marriage she ‘expected’ to be rejected? I feel like she was already crying foul before they got married, so maybe that is part of where this thinking is coming from. Also, was her own rejection of Royal protocol seen as a desire on her part to fashion that rejection? Or was it just the mid range narciness that got everyone into this mess? This is complex, and you could come at it from many different angles, none of them able to make it clear and all dependent on your own perspective. We know what she is. Would she have the capacity to turn the monarchy on its head in any kind of deliberate attempt to sow seeds of discord? If her behaviours are instinctive, which we know they are as a mid range narcissist, I think the rejection was going to come either way in the circumstances and from both parties. It’s the nature of her narcissism more than anything else, along side that of the others involved. That would be my opinion and, with what HG has so aptly explained up to now, I think the former editor might need to back off some of her potential ‘conspiracy theories’. Of course she doesn’t have HGs analysis and, much like the many other stories in the press he has been able to apply his outstanding knowledge to, an awareness of the underlying factor of narcissism can change everything. Another reason to keep spreading the word! I’d love to see that video, btw 😉
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Discover more from HG Tudor - Knowing The Narcissist - The World's No.1 Resource About Narcissism
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Has she even apologised for or acknowledged these bullying accusations
Brilliant HG.
Makes it so clear.
Doesn’t it seem strange that the pre release snippets from the Oprah event seem to demonstrate MM does actually know what the problem is?
She seems to be flailing around blaming everyone. BP HMTQ Kate and William the press the British people. And yet they chose to leave coz they didn’t get what they wanted half in half out deal. It seems so weird how the narrative seems to change all the time. We want privacy. Then appear for 2 hrs on TV in USA?? What’s that about?
How will this end?
1. Compartmentalisation.
2. The need to control in the NOW.
This is what causes the inconsistent (from your perspective) behaviour. The narcissist is blind to it.
Ah yes
It’s interesting that she thought the Royal family had not acted to protect her as we can see them now removing all protections by allowing an investigation to go ahead into alleged bullying accusations. It’s more likely, in that instance if proven, they protected her too much.
Saw a video by a former editor at Star suggesting that she WANTED to be rejected by the palace. That was the narrative she had prepared.
WOW, Violetta! That could potentially make sense to some people, but it would be stretching the ordinary imagination of most people to go there. You have to wonder what made the former editor suggest that. I’m not sure being an unaware mid-range narc that Meghan Markle could orchestrate such a complex narrative, and I’m not sure what the editor is basing that on. Was it prior to or after the marriage she ‘expected’ to be rejected? I feel like she was already crying foul before they got married, so maybe that is part of where this thinking is coming from. Also, was her own rejection of Royal protocol seen as a desire on her part to fashion that rejection? Or was it just the mid range narciness that got everyone into this mess? This is complex, and you could come at it from many different angles, none of them able to make it clear and all dependent on your own perspective. We know what she is. Would she have the capacity to turn the monarchy on its head in any kind of deliberate attempt to sow seeds of discord? If her behaviours are instinctive, which we know they are as a mid range narcissist, I think the rejection was going to come either way in the circumstances and from both parties. It’s the nature of her narcissism more than anything else, along side that of the others involved. That would be my opinion and, with what HG has so aptly explained up to now, I think the former editor might need to back off some of her potential ‘conspiracy theories’. Of course she doesn’t have HGs analysis and, much like the many other stories in the press he has been able to apply his outstanding knowledge to, an awareness of the underlying factor of narcissism can change everything. Another reason to keep spreading the word! I’d love to see that video, btw 😉