HG Mauls the Upper Mid Range Narcissist
Upper Mid Range Narcissist
HG Tudor as The Ultra has no allegiance to other narcissists and for you this is a good thing.
You are about to be educated and entertained as HG Tudor takes each sub school of narcissist and gives them a compact mauling for their failings and their collective disgrace to the narcissist brethren!
HG has summoned the various groups of narcissists before him as he delivers this compact mauling about their shortcomings which result in his visceral disgust for them. This mauling will enable you to understand far more about the characteristics of the relevant sub school of narcissist which includes the following
1. Appearance
2. Overall approach to the control of others
3. The nature of dynamics with romantic partners, friends, family and colleagues.
4. Levels of awareness
5. Differing styles of behaviour and how this manifests
6. The weaknesses of these narcissists
7. The self-perception adopted by these narcissists
8. How they approach manipulations
and more.
This collection will enable you to understand far more about what each sub school looks like and how they behave which adds to your armoury of knowledge. Even better, it is delivered in the form of a mauling from HG Tudor so you can gain a vicarious pleasure from his verbal volleys without any risk to you. Utilise this unrivalled information to understand the Upper Mid Range Narcissist to build your logic defences, to ensure you stay one step ahead of the narcissist and be entertained also.
2 thoughts on “HG Mauls the Upper Mid Range Narcissist”
Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
HG, I am curious to know why this worked.
I didn’t know our colleague was a narcissist when it happened. She was transferred to me, as she was in a fit over who knows what. I just kept repeating, “Do you hear yourself? You sound crazy right now? Stop, listen yourself.” Over and over until she backed down and excused herself (must maintain facade) and hung up the phone. There was a ST of one year after that.
Thinking back I did it to MMR too. He was wrong about the definition of a word. I just keep repeating. X is not Y. X is not Y. He eventually backed down.
Is backing down in these instances Withdrawal?
It is active withdrawal and is the third assertion of control.