The Futility Of Your Feelings

Feelings are an unnecessary burden and thankfully I have been relieved of many of them, being left only with those which are deemed necessary to enable me to pursue the harvesting of fuel. Feelings blur and weaken. How many times have you heard your alarm go off in the morning and you have rolled over feeling like you do not want to get up? Many times I should imagine. That feeling of apprehension about what the day holds for you, despondency at what has happened to you and dread about what you have to do weakens you and holds you back. You spend much of your life in the pursuit of this notion of happiness but are you ever truly happy? Do you look at what you have and wish you had more? Do you look at other people around you and imagine how happy they must be and you wish that you were more like them? All you achieve is bitterness. Perhaps you do feel happy but as the empath that you are you see those who you regard as less happy than you and you wish that they could be more like you. All you achieve is vanity. You spend so much of your time seeking to be happy and then you worry about whether it is fleeting in nature. You express concern that you just want to be happy and spend more and more time trying to achieve this state of nirvana. You suffer from feeling sadness which leads to paralysis and indecision. You feel frustrated which sucks up your energy and leaves you feeling spent. You take pride in your ability to feel and to be able to feel on behalf of others yet all you are doing is allowing yourself to be burdened. Why bother pursuing those feelings which are regarded as positive, such as joy, happiness and elation? Is the effort truly worth it when you get there only for it to be a fleeting moment which then casts you into despondency? What was the point of that? Why allow yourself to be mired in upset, misery and dejection? You achieve nothing as you slowly sink into a quagmire of such negativity. Your feelings deceive you, press down on you and above all else allow us to manipulate you. It is because you feel this array of emotions that you provide us with emotional reactions. Of course you know that these emotional reactions create my fuel. Your feelings are to blame.

I never acquired these feelings. This is because the pursuit of fuel cannot be distracted by these cumbersome emotions. They serve no purpose and thus were never developed. I am built for the acquisition of fuel and nothing else. I am an efficient design, single-minded and driven. All excess baggage was not jettisoned, it was never stowed on board to begin with. I am not wholly without feelings. I have been developed in a way to allow certain feelings, those that aid my purpose, to come to the fore. I feel fury which ensures that I can exert control over other people and thus extract fuel from them. I feel envy which drives me on to strip away those traits from other people which I need to create my construct. If I felt no envy, I would not want these characteristics – thus this feeling serves a purpose. There is no superfluous feeling connected with me. I feel jealousy which again causes me to strive to better that person by lauding my own achievements and prompting a reaction which garners positive fuel or by berating the person of whom I am jealous and thus I harvest negative fuel. I feel hatred. This allows me to see everything as it truly is. Hatred hones and brings into sharp focus the reality of this cruel world and thus I am better able to navigate my way through it. Hatred is visceral, it is not fluffy or amorphous. It does not cloud or blur. It is direct, straight to the point and electrifying in its capacity to allow me to always go forward. All of these feelings and ones of a similar nature have been fashioned around me to assist me in my quest for fuel. Each one discharges a method of enabling me to gather fuel so that I can feel the ultimate emotion. My pursuit of fuel is predicated on the use of these various emotions with the sole purpose of allowing me to feel that emotion which I prize above all others.

I feel powerful.

I am powerful.

181 thoughts on “The Futility Of Your Feelings

  1. Darwin refuted his Theory of Evolution. He adamantly professed that the sample size he used was too small and that he discovered that he had erred. The powers of his day told him to shut up, that the Evolution train had left the station, and for him to go and bother around with something else, and here we are, with people still believing in that colossal error of `scientific thought,` and perhaps people are still still teaching it, (I have no idea if that false theory is still being taught), but many parents have protested that theory being taught to their children, the last I heard, years ago. Many other people have rejected it, but are silent, while many still believe in all that. lol.

    1. Liza says:

      the theory of evolution can’t be reduced only to Darwin’s works, and now days it is the theory that is accepted by the scientific consensus.
      in science there is no such things as believes, there is either enaugh data and then, the right word is knowlege, or there is no suffuscient data, so we say that we don’t know. it has nothing to do with what one wants to be true, it is about facts that can be verified, tested an reproduced.

      1. Liza. Yeah. The scientific consensus has always interested me. And many theories that have been pushed in the name of proven scientific data, has interested me. People have been destroyed and even killed for going against established, believed to be factual by the most renown authorities, but false, `scientific` data. Scientists, in many fields, are a busy lot. And there is still much science, floating about, falsely called. And, I am sure we do not need to start a list of all the scientific theories and data that have failed, in many fields, despite how much they were admired and propped up by those of scientific authority, and by those of scientific expertise and aided by their promoters and their protecters, many of which had great wealth and power. Many accepted and promoted scientific theories are still failing. Many scientists have lived their entire lives and and then died believing many errors and falsehoods in their science, some of their own making. Observe but do not absorb, as much as possible. Buyer Beware, even of the latest `Science`.

        1. Liza says:

          in this case i need you to mension namly the the dangerous scientific theories that you are talking about, i need to know what i’m talking about in order to give accurate answers.
          look when a scientific theory is published, it is only after being reviewed buy other scientiist who are competent in the field, the protocole used is perfectly discribed and other scientist can replicate the resultes, when the resultes are replicated several times and they are matching then we can accepte it as true, untill we can do better. it is not about a dogmatic position.

          1. Liza: The Earth is Flat is one of those theories in a certain discipline, that finally was disproven, against so-called `hard science.` And if one disagreed, and said the earth was not flat, one was called an incredible lunatic, by the renown, respected and applauded scientists. Liza, I hope that you can find a few, or know about a few, once famous and `proven` but erroneous theories as well, in any discipline. Or, anyone else can chip in. Once a list of that sort of failed once-agreed-upon-theories is started, where will it end. And even when some theories are proven to be erroneous, like The Theory of Evolution, some people have dug in, and absolutely refuse to let go. Also, because some of these falsely proven theories go along with how many people feel and give them standing, for their bad behavior: Greed is Good. Yes, says The Mean Girls. lol. And remember, Lisk, politics, and economics, psychological manipulation, social manipulation, false pride, competition, hatred, etc. are also involved in what `scientific theories` get the go ahead by those that have the power, and which ones are buried, in all fields. The same sort of people, many call them `The Elite,` work together across many disciplines. So they come up with The Theory of Relativity in Science, and then likewise they say that Everything is Relative in other disciplines like Ethics and Morality especially in the case of Good and Evil: That there are no absolutes. And no absolute Truth (they hate truth, most of all), especially, or as they love to say: `it is all relative.` That was not a grass root catch-phrase. It was a result of the push of the Theory of Relativity. All of these `Elite` people work together across these many disciplines, saying they are riding the horses of Science, but really are galloping for their own goals to groom and control on behalf of themselves, the minds of the populace. To control the populace is to cope with the populace, for these types. Many good theories and inventions are destroyed and smeared, along with the people that attempted to bring them forth into the mainstream, because the powers over such progress, are against this for their own self-serving reasons, while many erroneous theories and bad theories and unimportant theories are knowingly pushed forward and set up instead, as science, in many disciplines, And many people, although not `The Elite,` go along, for whatever their reasons, even when they know the science is wrong. Not all, of course. And the line of polarization in much that has has been called `science` has been drawn: Those that will believe these people and a lot of their `science,` can not be moved. And those that see through them, and a lot of what they call `science,` can not be moved. And many people that are caught in the middle, actually do not know. Many people caught in the middle have unknowingly worked and are still working on `scientific,` experiments and pushing erroneous scientific theories, in many disciplines, that will cause there very own personal physical and mental destruction, etc. A tiny, tiny, tiny example: I saw this movie once, and some scientists were working on something very bad in the Lab. And while I was watching the movie, I was thinking to myself, why would some people want to develop something so awful like that??? But, then something went wrong in the lab and the experiment broke through the isolation protocol, and those scientists were turned into ravening monsters, as they became contaminated by this product, that they were developing to be used against other people, and using other peoples` money, and I laughed: Schadenfreude.

          2. Liza says:

            you seem to mixe between many consepts and deciplines, i will try to address your answer step by step.
            _ the earth is round you will not finde a single scientist who will tell you otherwise, and you do not have to believe anyone, you just have to study to convince yourself.
            _evolution is not some shady theory that extremists hold on to, it is a solide theory that allowed us to make many predicitons that turned out to be true, and the predictions where both on the potential fossils we can expect to finde and pential species we can expect to discover.
            for hard sciences it is actually verry easy to prove the effnciency of it, because the results are concrete, to site Dawkins “it’s works bitches” ( i’m realy sorry for the vulgarity, i gave the expression as it is).

            you also talked about good and bad, elites and social ranks….ect, these have nothing to do with science, it is a field named moral philosophy, i don’t know much about it.
            note that science is not prescreptive, it is descriptive, it will tell you about a phenomenom, discribe it, give it’s proprities but, do not expect it to tell you what is good or bad, or what to do or not do.
            now, when a politician or journalist or any media is talking about science, please understand that their use of science is the same as humpty dumpty’s use of words, it will mean what they want it to mean, if you want the real information refer to scientific literature not to biased and politicaly oriented medias.
            i get that you are telling me to have critical spirit, and i 100% agree. but critical spirit is about asking for proofs, explanations, verifiying the sources, and accepting to change ones minde when presented with sufficent data. if you systematically reject evryhting, is not critical spirit.

        2. lisk says:

          Sounds like a healthy skepticism to me, PSE.

          Like religion, science is a human construct that is trying to get to the “truth.”

          I doubt humans will ever get to *the* truth. They will only get to a bunch of ‘true enoughs.’

          A scientific conclusion/theory/whatever is only as good as the dataset. And no one can capture all the data.

          Hence, why there’s always a new discovery that beats the pants off the old one.

          1. lisk People are going to discover even less of the truth than their natural and reasoning and cognitive function and curiosity would have taken them, because for decades people in general are being pushed by `the Elite` to believe that: There is no Truth. hahaha. To control the populace, the Powers do not want the populace to believe that Truth exists. Truth is a Huuuge problem for many powerful people. And, Truth is gasping for breath and is tired and is exhausted from the constant assaults upon it, but it has not been completely snuffed out as of yet. My goodness.

    2. Liza: I have not mixed concepts and disciplines. They are intermingled. And often self fulfilling, and exist amongst each other and not in individual vacuums. And just because a section of a faulty formula works out for you, does not mean the entire formula is correct. Including Darwinism. Darwinism failed. Just because I use a faulty map or GPS and still find the nearby grocery story, using a part of that faulty map, does not mean that the faulty map will take me to my destination, at end. Even if the faulty map is a best seller and celebrated as being correct. And yes, respected scientists used all of the methods that you discussed and still came up with a faulty conclusion that the world is flat, and other scientists that disagreed were ostracized. And even now, scientists in various disciplines, that develope the theories approved of by the powers, in many disciplines, including Politics and Sociology and Economics and Psychiatry and Politics, etc. will be propped up. Those that go against the theories of the powers, will not find funding, will be smeared, will not be published, will be ostracized, will be destroyed and banished and muzzled and even killed, etc. This is not new. Just like in NYC where I live, the Environmental Scientists that were propped up by the the Powers, said that said it was safe to work down there and to clean up the debris after the obliteration of the famous Twin Towers located in the financial district. I said, while listening to the many press conferences, WHAT???? SAFE????? I did not go back down there. Then, many men fought for the contracts to work down there and clean up the degree from that colossal obliteration. And did part time work. And volunteer work. Now those people are now dying, including the firefighters and the police officers that investigated and worked on the salvage part time, etc, and they also have became very ill and have died and are fighting for the money from a fund that people demanded to be set up for them. Some are trying to be labeled for PTSD, but because it was ruled to be safe down there, the PTSD status is difficult for them to obtain, in some sort of circular politics versus psychiatric battle and legal and medical precedent concerns. Those ill people are like clowns in a circus jumping though hoops trying to obtain that money for their illnesses, and their families for their estates, once they die. All for listening to those propped up Environmental Scientists with their false agreed upon reports and faulty experiments and bad tests and faulty conclusion and incorrect ruling that working down there was: SAFE! However, the scientists that said and tried to get out the message that it was not safe could not do so, and tried, but to no avail, because they said (in their exposes` years later) that they were blocked. They tried to get the info to the public that that area and place was a stew of poison, some of the type they had never seen before, and they reported years later, that they were shut down and afraid from threats by powerful people, and they were locked out from the media, and that their scientific reports were buried and they were told to shut up and they were muzzled about their stance that that area was not safe. Science and Politics and Economics and Psychiatry, and Sociology, etc. co-mingle and often are influenced by each other to serve the various aims of powerful people. So, I am not mixing up concepts and disciplines like you say I am doing. They are already mixed up together, in reality, whether I say so or not.

      1. Liza says:

        you are talking about politics, not science, as i previously stated there is no need trying to finde knowlege from politics and media, because it is not their job, and they have other objectives.
        you state that evolution failled, what makes you think that ? and i insist, restric your argument to facts, not opinions.
        and for the flat earth contrary to the story, that Galile was alone agaist evryone, it is not true, greecs already had models about the round earth, and even in Galile’s time most scientist agree that the earth is round they just don’t shout it verry loud, and if you are talking about our present era, those who state that the earth is flat, are either people who write shady theorie and want to sell theme, it is their business ,or endoctrinated people who have been given no chance to educate themeselves, fearing that one god or an other might be displeased.

        1. Liza. I am sure that you know that you can do some searches and find failed scientific theory throughout time. But, that is up to you. So, it is your choice to do so or not. So, there really is nothing mysterious or esoteric about that fact to debate about. There is plenty of poison to pick over in that regard, if one so desired to take a peek into it, if one was unaware. And, scientists are also Politicians, etc. And have preferences in what they want to work on or not. And are subject to their own biases, in every discipline. They do not exist as supreme beings that can not be naively or willingly deceived, as well. And are subject to coercion. And promote the coercion of others. I know many scientific theories that are currently wrong, but are very controversial, and would definitely set off the blue touch paper. But like they say in Star Trek, keep the prime directive as much as possible and let people believe what they feel solid about. I take that stand also, to protect myself and to be wisely pro–social. That is why I gave you the example of the faulty belief that comes and goes that the earth is flat. It is a pro-social example. That will not cause me problems from others. Anyway, many scientists also willingly deceive and falsify experiments and remove any person when they can, that find out that there are flaws in their theories. Some ignore the flaws, especially when their reputations and even their pride would take a hit. Some scientists are just pawns for the highest bidder. And scientists like anyone else, can only do what is within their individual personal and mental capacity. And If you want, you can probably google failed scientific theories that were once thought to be true by scientists all over the world that is false. But, only if you actually want to look into it. Your choice. Depending on what mood google is in on any given day, info. is available for you. And Darwinism has failed, and Apes still will not turn into people. And survival of the strongest has failed in Darwinism in the way it was supposed to work. Even Darwin said so, but he was told to shut up, and that the evolution train had left the station, with flying colors. And many love the theory, for a variety of their own reasons, in many disciplines. Perhaps time is the only thing that will show this to you, that Darwinism has failed. You have the right to believe in it and believe that you are satisfied with the evidence on its behalf. Liza, I hope that I am not giving you the impression that I am trying to convince you to believe or not believe in Darwinism. We all have free will. Most people are set in their respective beliefs in this era, anyway. A line has been drawn and people are pretty much on one side or the other regarding most things. The gray area is becoming lonely. And, yes, there are many staunch Darwinists, and they will be supported, unless they are chased away. And Darwin admitted that the more he studied, the more he knew that there was a Creator. He was told to shut up. And, Big Bang became the new rule of the day. Anyway, Liza, If Apes could turn into people, why did they stop doing so? They got bored? They did not like the concept of income taxes? They had a meeting to stop turning into people, in a No More, sort of movement? They just said, NO? If Apes could still do that, and now decide to return to doing such a thing, as to turn into people, that would be the exhibit of the century in any zoo. I would definitely buy a ticket to watch. And there are plenty of Apes in the zoo right now, in NYC.

          1. Liza says:

            please please please don’t get offended with what i’m going to tell you it is absolutely not told with a judgmental set of minde ,but from what you have writen you do not unserstand the theory of evolution.
            and yes reasurching in google is a good idea, one has to pay attension to who write what, and even the key words you use, if i choose to reasurche, “the theory of evolusion is false” i will get articles that will go may way, and if write “the theory of evolution is true” i will be presented with articles that will go may way
            and yes, there is theories that have been proven to be false, but note that they were recongnised as suche when sufficient proofs had been provided.
            i’m sorry if i sound harsh it is really not my intension, i just can’t figure out an other way to convey my idea.

          2. Witch says:

            Hi PSE,
            I believe the theory is that we share a common ancestor with the great apes before all became separate species. We are also a type of ape closely related to the other apes, so they won’t become people just like a gorilla wont become an orangutan because each species took a different direction and it was working for all.
            I say “was working” because human disturbance is leading to the extinction of the other species of ape.

          3. Liza. I am not offended. I am enjoying myself. I always do when I talk to you. Because you never come with malice. And, I never said for you to research the Theory of Evolution per se. I said to research failed scientific theories, if you were unaware of the heaps of them, even though they were once thought proven to be true by renown scientists. They were still false. And maybe google can show some results, if you are interested, or even the Library, etc. . And that Theory of Evolution and Big Bang, is not even one set thing, as it is constantly being redone, because it can not stand. Like an old faulty door with a million layers of new paint. If many are still into it, they have the right. I actually did not know that people still believed in it. So, that is interesting for me to know, and I will not be blindsided in the future, if someone places that theory before me. And I will then quietly remove myself somehow from debating it with them, these days. Because, there would be no point. In all seriousness. Anyway, frankly, I am working on some tax papers right now, and maybe the Apes were right, when they stopped turning into humans, when they heard about all the taxes they were going to be subjected, including property tax, and income tax, and death tax, and wage tax, and window tax, and estate tax, school tax, and inheritance tax, and investment tax, profit tax, utility tax, and cable tax, transportation tax, and tax tax, etc. Maybe Taxes killed the dinosaurs, as well. With just one look at a tax form, the dinosaurs all perished, right then and right there. They lost all desire to continue to evolve. They evolved all the way from tiny birds, to huge dinosaurs, and then with with one look at a tax form, and they saw the end game, that they they were heading to, in their evolution process, was just to be taxed? They angrily, just said, NO! They gave up altogether, in one fell swoop, and died right on the spot. Who could blame them. I wish the Big Bang would blow up some of these tax forms on this planet. Where is the Big Bang when one needs it. I think a redo is in order.

          4. Witch. Yes they keep working on the Ape theory, and say maybe it was a special sort of Ape etc. And blah, blah, blah, and Whatever, because they adamantly refuse to say that the Creator created mankind. So they have their hands full with their theories, and their photos of people finally standing up straight after they evolved from apishness genetics, and all that, and they have that right, and those that believe them have that right to follow along with them and believe them. Freedom of thought and belief. I just did not know that people still believed in it. And the fact that many people act even less than Apes, even these days, is probably a delight to the scientists that push Evolution and Big Bang on whomever will believe them, to this very day.

          5. Liza says:

            me too ! i like talking to you.
            grrr…. administrative work is my kryptonite, good luck ith your taxes.

          6. Witch says:

            There’s a lot more evidence for evolution than an invisible creator.
            I mean… giant lizard like creatures once walked on the earth, (birds today and reptiles are an off shoot of dinosaurs), what would have been god’s purpose for that?

          7. FYC says:

            Hello PSE and Liza, just for the sake of accuracy, science offers neither truth or falseness. Scientific research offers support of hypotheses or the lack thereof. It puts forth theory based upon prevailing, available research. These theories are always, by definition limited, because we never possess all data or the resident knowledge to fully and with complete accuracy, process such data at any point in time. Even math is only absolute to the degree to which the axioms allow it to be absolutely true.

            It seems we humans tend to narrowly define things to increase comfort, reduce uncertainty, to serve ego and/or an agenda and/or to assert control. Media has nothing to do with science and even when reporting on science, often fails miserably at accurate representations. Media always has an agenda. It is up to us to seek a better understanding of any prevailing theory and the science behind it, so we do not fall prey to someone else defining our thoughts and reality for us. It seems like you both do this from different perspectives.

            PSE you are spot on about the twin towers. Any particulate matter inhaled overtime will destroy lung function and can ultimately lead to death. (This happened to a relative of mine). This has been known for many decades. False assurances are dangerous. Also to your point, funding of research is agenda driven. Politicians, corporations and foundations drive those agendas, so yes, power and politics have an influence.

          8. FYC: Some scientific Researchers in all disciplines often have unfair and bad agendas as well. And have justified destroying many people, in many ways, in the name of science and bad science and biased data. And they will pull out a million charts and formulas to justify their bad doings. I will not let such scientists sneak quietly away from this discussion. And many scientists have willingly also backed information that supported their faulty biases and many have brought forth information that supported their faulty biases and have also smothered data that did not support their biases, and even falsified data, and all this still goes on in science. There is plenty of science, falsely called. So, it is not only the media and all, that misuse science. There are many scientists that knowingly misuse science as well, in all disciplines. And from childhood, it seems to me now, that the populace in general are groomed to see or hear the word `science,` and then all of their logical and critical faculties stop working: Like a form of sleeper-cell hypnosis. `Oh, Don`t talk bad about Science,` they practically shout at one, without realizing it. Well, I am talking bad about a lot of it. And a lot of bad comes from a lot of it. You know what I love to see, FYC? I love when I see children break apart theories that adults live and swear by. LIke when a child asks, about the Big Bang theory: `How does something come from nothing?` And then asks, `can you show me how to create something from nothing?` Hahaha. I find the question interesting. And children ask questions like, `When will my pet bird turn into a dinosaur. I want to tame a dinosaur.` I would like to tame one, as well. Especially, many of these dinosauric false and bad theories propped up by bad and faulty science.

          9. FYC says:

            PSE, your comment “the populace in general are groomed to see or hear the word `science,` and then all of their logical and critical faculties stop working”

            Definitely not true for me, and I hope not for others.

          10. Liza says:

            hello FYC, i totaly agree with what you said, and you expressed it better than i will never be able to, thank you verry much.

          11. FYC says:

            You are very kind Liza. Thank you, but I think you did a fine job.

          12. PrincessSuperEmpath says:

            Witch: Your question is incredibly important. And there is no easy answer on how to tell a Truth from a Lie in various situations and regarding various information. And there is no one answer on how to tell a truth from a lie. And on top of that, all people are not supposed to know the truth about certain things. And, also, some people have a gift at getting at the truth of a matter, and some people do not. They have the gift of the spirit of truth. And even when someone that is ever so eloquent is before them, such people with the gift of the spirit of truth will still see the Flaws and Errors and Lies, when applicable, in what such eloquent and sophisticated people are saying, and will not be hypnotized and seduced away from the Truth by fine speech and a multitude of charts and equations and books and pamphlets, etc. And even on top of that, Truth reveals herself to certain people and hides herself from certain other people. But, just by knowing that there is a such thing as The Truth, and that there is such a thing as A Lie, as you have shown, in my opinion, by your question to me, you are already eons ahead of many people, especially the people that love lies. And I wish for you that Truth reveals herself to you more and more over time, in areas of your concern.

          13. Liza says:

            no body will be able to convince you because you are mixing evrything, the more you write the more you demonstrate that you do not know muche about the theories that you are criticising,
            and you are not willing to learn about them, you just want them to be false in order in enforce your actual beliefes.
            and i admit that i can’t see how it is so dificult for you to accepte that something that is well explaning and tested and it works, and you right now are using devices that are made based on models that you criticies, but you have no problem believing that a god that you never saw and have no proof of, had created evrything (and not that you don’t know how that god himself had come to existe either).

          14. PrincessSuperEmpath says:

            Liza: Everything is devolving. Being destroyed. Including the earth. Including the people. If an intervention of an astonishing nature is not implemented at some point, everything will be destroyed. A grape used to be the size of a watermelon. People lived very long and looked very beautiful for a very very very long time. Many men say that many women go down hill when they past their 30s these days. People`s minds were once very strong. Now people can barely keep up with the names of the few people they actually encounter and many people constantly forget their own passwords, etc. etc.. The entire planet and the people and their minds are constantly being weakened and destroyed in masse. Liza, you are very smart. It would not surprise me in the least, if some of your ideas move towards mine in the fullness of time. But, that is not my call to make. And Truth is never popular. And it is not for everyone. And Truth is often very, very, very offensive to many people. I have not even begin to speak of some of the Truths that I know about. And, now I sure will not. This is not the place. Just like HG says, he is just warming up regarding telling us about all he knows. And quite a few of us are still stumped about the schools and cadres. Anyway, Truth is also a persona non grata on this planet. Plus, people create their own Truths more than ever before. Many of which are lies. But, this is the time of lies. They thrive. Truth is often hated, Especially when it goes against commons consensus. And popular science. And when it goes against what the renown Scholars of the day are saying and teaching. And when it goes against what ones parents taught them and TV and movies, and ones Professors and lots and lots of books. Truth speakers often sound like ravening lunatics until every thing they say comes to pass. Also, and this is a real stunner: Truth often gives her information to the people that this world calls: weak. And to people that this world calls: foolish. Few wise according to this world and Few rich and few Renown of this world, have the Truth. It pleases Truth to be this way. Just like it pleases HG Tudor to largely give his info to Empaths. It pleases him to do that. Many unknown, informally educated, empaths on here, therefore could rip to shreds many so-called scholars of NPD, because they study with HG Tudor. Anyway, many have power and money and prestige, but seldom the truth. People have been killed, ostracized, banished, mocked etc, for speaking the truth. It does not bother me if someone does not believe me. But, I will not be pointed at, when anyone around me tries to say, at any point in their lives, that in their day, EVERYONE went along with what they were saying. So, for the record, I DID NOT go along with it. So, I reiterate, I am not going along with The Theory of Evolution, The Theory of Relativity and Darwinism, The Big Bang Theory, much of which is the subject of most of this thread. You think you are disagreeing with me. But, you are not. You are actually disagreeing with the Truth. You just do not believe that I could be possibly telling the truth, and that I am really shock full of ignorance and mis-understanding about science. hahaha. And that is absolutely your right and anyone else’s right, to believe what and whom they desire. And to believe that anyone that does not go along is weak in foolish. So be it.

        2. lisk says:

          Oh, but science is so in bed with politics, at least in the US, it’s not even funny.

          And while the current administration certainly pumps a lot of money into research universities and their “science” via NIH funding, this flow certainly didn’t start here. (My guess is the peak occurred under the Obama administration.)

          It is very, very difficult to break up the relationship between the government (politics) and the science that relies on government funding, at least in the US (where most of the innovations happen to occur).

          1. NA. These modern phrases are going to jam many people up and mess peoples` minds up, with phrases such as: My Truth and Your Truth. This way of talking came from The Theory of Relativity. People can have all the personal Truths that they want. But, their personal Truth is either True, or their personal Truth is a Lie. Truth is. A Lie constantly has to be propped up, and the propping up has no end: Until The Truth, finally at some point in time, destroys the Lie and puts and end to the Lie. Some People`s personal Truth is actually: The Truth. Some other Peoples` personal Truth is actually: a Lie. And this sort of talking of personal Truths does not work on high levels in serious circumstances. A person can not murder someone and then say to the Judge and Jury and the Prosecution: that according to their personal Truth, the person has survived being murdered by them, and thus they do not want to have to go to prison, because they do not identify as a murderer, and that they do not want to be jailed, because they identify as a free person, and this is their Truth. The person speaking such stuff may be sentenced to the Psyche ward for the criminally insane and imprisoned there instead of with the general criminal population. But, they will still be imprisoned, despite their personal Truth. All this odd sort of talk, that the populace in general are being groomed to speak, just will not work on high levels and in serious circumstances.

          2. Witch says:

            How do you propose we distinguish between a truth and a lie?

      2. Witch: Like I said to Liza, I did not know that people in general still believed in the Theory of Evolution/Big Bang, but that they have that right, and there is no point then for me to debate with them, and go nowhere, during this era of polarization. But, for the record, Dinosaurs et al ate the lushness of the earth. they were living lawn mowers. They died in the flood. And Dinosaurs did not evolve from birds and and people from apishness, etc. And like I said, I did not know that people still believed this stuff and were still taught this stuff. But, remember, the people that teach this stuff to you do not necessarily believe it themselves, nor any of the other theories that they may still be teaching to the masses, such as relativity and such, and that there is no truth, and stuff like that. These people are happy when you push such ideas on yourself and your family and your friends and your children and your society. But do not push that madness within their spheres of seriousness. And, when you are in front of a grand jury, for example, and the judge asks you if you will tell the truth. I would advise you NOT to respond: There is no Truth. And if you are asked, if you feel remorse for your bad behaviour in driving recklessly and killing five children: I would advise you to NOT respond to the judge: There is no good, nor evil. And if you are asked if you know right from wrong, and if you would reflect on it over time, I would advise you NOT to respond to the judge: It`s all relative. And I would advise people not to spout any such stuff to anyone of a high level when matters are of a serious nature. Many of these ideas and theories taught to destroy the minds of the masses are not tolerated by people at high levels within their own spheres. That stuff is for you to believe. Oh, and if on some job application questionnaire, if you are asked, if a tree falls in a jungle and no one was around, would the tree make a sound. Please answer, yes. For the sake of all that is good, when the tree falls, it does make a sound! Thank you.

        1. Witch says:

          Hi PSE,
          When you mention the flood are you referring to the flood event in the bible?
          Dinosaurs and humans didn’t live at the time so dinosaurs could not have become extinct by the biblical flood.

          1. Witch says:

            *dinosaurs and humans didn’t live at the SAME time

          2. Witch, Dinosaurs and people lived at the same time. And Adam named all of the animals. And they feared people. All creatures feared people. The Dinosaurs died during the flood. Their job ended: Their job was to eat the abundant lushness of the earth and clear pathways through the lushness. That theory of Evolution is just something that is going to cause people that believe in that a lot of problems. People that persist in all of that Big Bang, and Evolution and all of the teachings that the Earth is billions of years old and trillions and then whatever and whatever, are one day going to have to face the fact that they inherited lies. And do not come after me. Go after whomever taught and whomever are teaching you all of these LIES that you are believing. I am telling the truth, not to convince a resistant person, or even you Witch, but for the record, and for the fact that one day, when Truth is able to take a stand, they can not say, that NO ONE ever told them the truth. And there are people that read on here that do not post, and maybe did not know some of the things that I am saying, and are thankful to know. I am posting for them as well. It is amazing that people that speak the truth face great resistance, while what liars say, many people swallow hole, and without even chewing on it. But, there is a saying that: the Truth is so precious, that it is surrounded by a bodyguard of Lies.

          3. NarcAngel says:

            You are presenting YOUR truth. People have different truths, and therein lies the problem.

          4. Witch says:

            Hi PSE
            All of the physical evidence we have for the existence of dinosaurs demonstrates that they are much older than us and lived before us.. fossil evidence proves that not all life existed at the same time. DNA proves this also.
            You are free to dismiss the evidence… I’m just saying.
            Many churches and religious sects have adapted to modern knowledge by suggesting that god caused evolution because it has not been disproven.
            I was raised to believe in god. My dad was raised as a Jehovah witness as well as my step dad. I had to discover on my own how the sect manipulates information because independent thinking would have been discouraged. I would suggest that you find some new sources, there are some good books out there about evolution that explain it in layman’s terms so that it’s easier to understand.

          5. NarcAngel says:

            It’s not so much that evolution is so hard to understand. More that one has to be open to other possibilities and want to understand. The bible is definitely not in layman’s terms but those who embrace it don’t seem to have difficulty despite the many different interpretations.

          6. Witch: I stand by everything I said. And like I said, many people are going to learn that they have inherited lies, and there is going to be a lot of finger pointing and blame shifting. So, time will tell whom is telling the truth. Everyone has to pick a side. And choose their beliefs and what is true to them. But, Truth is one. Lies have many versions and are endless. This is the time for people to themselves believe what they consider is Truth. This is the time for people to say, well, I believe this, and I believe that, and I believe the other ,etc, etc. This is not the time where Truth is settling the debates. Truth is just sitting on the sidelines, watching it all. This is the time for people to chose their own Truths. In the fulness of Time, all Lies will fall. And the Liars will be chased and will have to run for their lives, because many people are going to try to chase them down, and in anger.

          7. PrincessSuperEmpath says:

            NA, just because someone presents their Truth it does not necessarily mean that their Truth is not The Truth. For example, if I say that My Truth is that 2 plus 2 equals 4, it does not mean that The Truth that 2 plus 2 equals 4 is up for debate. Some peoples` truth will also be The Truth. Some peoples` Truth will be lies. The Truth will stand. The lies will fall in the fullness of time. So, there is no problem that The Truth at a time determined will not settle between people`s personal truths that are lies, and people`s personal truths that are true. And often, The Truth is not popular, is controversial, offends science and current beliefs and renown scholars, and is just very offensive to many people. Nothing new about that. And those that speak The Truth that goes against much of the popular truths and the varying beliefs of many people and their personal truths, are often scorned, and are basically told to go take a hike. So nothing new is happening under the sun, regarding The Truth.

          8. Witch, that scientific evidence as you call it is propped up and pushed to protect and boost the current false theories of The theory of Evolution and Big Bang and `Darwinism*` on the populace. It is all comfy and in bed together with all the other disciplines that desire this theory to have believability in the minds of the populace. *Darwin never wanted his name attached to that madness, and he fought against his own theory, because he said it was wrong, but he lost the battle. And was told to shut up and stand down. Just like Roe, did not want her name attached to Roe Vs Wade as a participating case for legalized abortion. She never had the abortion, and she gave birth to the child, and she fought against abortion, and had nightmares of all the aborted that were done with her case, she said. Roe was her fake name, Wade is a country. She was told to shut up. She tried to stop them from using her as an evidence case, but people still cite Roe vs Wade. She lost that fight. She still demonstrated against abortion the rest of her life.

          9. Witch says:

            Good point!

        2. Lorelei says:

          Princess—this isn’t the correct spot exactly to comment on your energy levels, etc—but.. I promise you it will not only come back but it will be likely more substantial than before. I have had ongoing frustration over a few things somewhat related and it occurred to me that it won’t feel the same, but it will be better as it is becoming better.

          1. Lorelei: Thank you! You made an interesting point. I absolutely may be looking for it to feel the same, when it may come back as something different, and feel different. I have to reflect on that point. Before I miss some progress that I may be making, because I am looking the wrong way. And, yes…it is frustrating.

          2. Lorelei says:

            You are making progress—it’s just a different brand than it used to be. I really became dampened cognitively. I kinda slumped about two years before we separated—it was like I had nothing left. I had zero anything left and that is when I slept constantly, gained weight, couldn’t manage anything.. I think HG describes a co-dependent crashing similarly but I just stayed crashed. I only bring this up because I thought I’d never be ok again, wasn’t sure why but I had that thought constantly. I am differently ok now and think even this will be more refined and better. I’m excited about teaching and couldn’t even put two and two together a year ago.

          3. Oh Lorelei: I am so glad you found something to be excited about. I am thinking of joining a coed softball league this summer. Only 2 women are permitted on each team. So, it is mostly men. I like playing sports and being on a team, and I have some athletic ability. I want to be around more men. I think I have been around women just too much, and that is one of the reasons that the N. stood out so much for me. But, on here, I realize that many women are around a lot of men, just in their normal life. So that is what I plan to do. And, I may obtain more balance just by being around the opposite sex more. And, ironically, I was closing in to joining a league around 3 years ago, and then I saw the N. for the first time. BOOM. Unbelievable.

          4. Lorelei says:

            I remember we talked about this once! I want to do a rock climbing group (on Meetup) but the holidays need to get past us.

        3. Liza says:

          i will say it again, it is not about believes, it is not about opinions, the models that are mad with the theory of evolution work

          Einstein’s theory of relativity has nothing to do with the good or bad, or there is no truth.

          i will not try to convince you myself, because :
          1_ i’m not a biologist, and i’m not a physicist, i will certainly do a bad job and bring no value.
          2_ the more i try to convince you the more your brain will resist and take it as me wanting to foce you to adopte my position.

          i suggest that you read about the scientific methode, and see by youself how resurches are really made.
          and the good manner to learn is not by searching only the arguments that will go with what you already think, it is called a confirmation bias, and this is what i was trying to convey, when i was talkign about surching in google.

          the major broblem with science , is that the brute document is most of the time hard to read for the general public, because it is made by scientists for scientists, and they fail to correctly explain their work to the general public.
          but now days there are a lot of people who hold blogs and youtube channels, where they do an amazing work of vulgarisation, with of course providing the sources and the documents, you don’t have to believe them you can check by yourself.

          1. Liza: I know all about the scientific method. But if at the end, if the result is erroneous, the method failed. For example, If an intense formula discusses an onion, and then a chair that has 4 legs and an that an onion can be positioned on a chair and there is a horse in the room, and the horse also has 4 legs, and a zillion of other facts that are true, in a mile long equation that is tested and that looks like hieroglyphics, but the conclusion of that formula is that: an onion is also a horse, then the method failed, whether or not I can find the flaw in the long and tiresome esoteric looking equation. The method failed, at end, Because, an onion is not a horse.

          2. Liza says:

            what you did here is that you took an exemple that you fabricated yourself, and that has nothing to do with science, but you presented it as if it was science, and you know that the exemple you choose is absurde and i will be foolish trying to defend it.

          3. Liza. I think we both have made many points about how we look at the world of scientific consensus. I can not think of more to add presently at this time.

          4. Liza. There are plenty of scientific theories as absurd as saying an onion is a horse. Perhaps someone will feel like researching absurd scientific theories that were thought to be true by scientists all while they used scientific methodology.

          5. Liza says:

            there scentific theorie that where proved to be wrong, no body is saying that it is not true, but the good thing is when it is proved to be false, it is recognised as false and corrected, you may not realise it but it is an argument that plays for science, it is the proof that htere is progress.

          6. Liza: There are plenty of known false scientific theories, in many disciplines, that are green lighted, and that are not corrected, and that are still promoted and given a ticket to ride. Kudos to those that are corrected. Booooo to the many that are knowingly allowed to ride on in error.

    3. MommyPino says:

      Hi PSE, I don’t want to engage in the Theory of Evolution. I just want to share to you that I have these Christian based Science books that I am using for my kids to add or supplement to what they are learning from public school. These book are so interesting and amazing how they tie up science with the scriptures and also compare and contrast Intelligent Design versus Evolution. I have to say that there are indeed logical flaws to the Theory of Evolution. I know that my kids will be taught the Theory of Evolution in their school so I think it is nice for them to learn about the other side of the argument from our home and they can make up their minds what to believe.

    1. Violetta: There were some studies of dogs being hostile towards certain races of people. But, after more investigation it was determined that a dog`s keen sense of smell and familiarity with its owner , stimulated the dog to react against certain races of people. So, it was determined that the dog`s owner, despite the owners words or visible body language of peace toward certain races, gave off an adrenaline scent of fear/danger/hate/hostility, etc., around certain races of people and the dog smelled this scent on their owner and then the dog showed hostility towards certain races of people, because of the humanly imperceptible scent the owner gave off around said people, but their dog could smell the owners alarm scent. So it is possible that a dog could sense their owner`s natural or instinctive, etc., reaction around actual Narcissists in general, and the dog would then respond either positively or negatively towards Narcissists, depending on the dog`s owner`s peace or war scent reaction to the Narcississt.

      1. Violetta says:

        PSE: So the handler may have liked Pence and not Trump, and the dog picked up on it?
        Makes sense.

        1. NarcAngel says:

          I noted the article said something about it being protocol not to touch service animals, so in that way it’s fair enough, but Pence didn’t observe that. Not everyone likes animals (I do just to be clear) but using that protocol sure was handy for the Trumps. I’m amused at the thought that Melania might think touching a dog is distasteful but she has actually engaged in raw dog with that other dog at the very least once lol. Shiver.

          1. Violetta says:

            The usual rule with service dogs is you don’t pet them when they’re in harness, because they are working and shouldn’t be distracted. Out of harness, they may be quite pettable, but it’s best to ask the handler (which Pence may well have done).

            Dog certainly looks a sweetie <3

        2. Violetta: hahaha. Who knows. The dog picked up on something! What, though? Who knows. He is still just a dog. Hahaha.

          1. Violetta says:

            “Just” a dog?
            I’ve had neighbors’ dogs tell me when I had flu or depression before *I* knew about it.
            Sometimes guardian angels are furry.

          2. Violetta. No Doubt, It depends on the dog. I also heard that dogs are being trained to sniff out diseases and such. And many save lives. So, I am not putting down dogs in general, by saying it is just a dog. They are loving and have wonderful purposes. But, as far as saying they are one hundred percent accurate? No, I will not say that. And, It is easy to confuse them. And they have their own instincts that come into play, even at random. And still, they are dogs, in the end. And who can change that fact? I rarely talk about dogs, for whatever reason. Maybe I will pass in the future. Maybe it is a DANGER ZONE and I did not know this.

          3. Violetta says:

            This one had no special training, but he was a Great Pyrenees, and they are bred to protect flocks from predators. I had to wave at him and let him eat at me through the window every time I went in and out or he’d keep barking. They can be very nurturing: there’s footage on YT of a Pyrenees gently nuzzling a baby goat recovering from some kind of medical treatment.

        3. Violetta: I was not able to click on and open the article. My posting was just to the statements regarding dogs and their judgements, that I remember reading about, once. But, dogs also kill babies and do bad things as well, so I am not going to over glamorize all dogs, either.

          1. Violetta says:

            As with narcs, abuse coupled with bad inborn traits is a terrible mix. Some of the dogs Michael Vick abused became therapy dogs, but when you breed violent parents together, you get increasingly violent offspring with every generation. Look up the Soviet fox experiment. That took only 50 years to produce two distinct lines.

      2. MommyPino says:

        PSE, wow that really makes a lot of sense. Thank you for that info. My MRE sister was very much into dogs and all of the dogs that she had were very loyal and devoted to her and even most dogs seemed to like her as she was very sweet to them and always had a treat for them. Applying what you said, those dogs liked her as well because she didn’t look very threatening to their owners. She was very charming and histrionic with the way that she would show her affection towards the dogs which most of their owners liked.

        1. MommyPino: It is interesting about dogs. And how some dogs take on the feelings of their owners via the scent response of their owners toward other people. What I find funny also are people that look like their dogs. I saw a contest like that once, and people sent in photos of themselves and their dogs. Side by side. Incredible. I once I saw an article about celebrities looking like certain animals with side to side comparisons. So funny. MommyPino: I find talking pet birds sometimes funny. And talking birds that grasp something bad that their owner has said. But, sometimes these birds hold it in unknowingly to their owner (little children sometimes do the same thing to their parents) And then one day, during the worst possible time for the owner, the bird bursts out loudly and repeats the embarrassing word or phrase, that the the bird was holding in, shockingly before the wrong guests. Hahaha. Is it just an unfortunate coincidence with some of these birds? I have no idea. lol.

          1. Violetta says:

            Better a random cuss word than what the owner really thinks about the boss–who is there for dinner.

          2. Violetta: Sure, but these birds can also spout out complete, if short, sentences. About the very type of thing that you mentioned. These birds sometimes seem to have an ear for the extreme. Hahaha.

          3. Violetta says:

            “Mr Burns is a horse’s heinie! >SQUAWK!whistle<"

          4. WhoCares says:


            My grandmother had a rainbow lorikeet that would randomly shout out: “You’re gonna DIE!”

            It takes repetition for them to retain sayings.

            Pretty sure Grandma was an animal “loving” mid-ranger.

          5. MommyPino says:

            Haha PSE my MRE sister did look a little bit like her dog. They both had blonde hair (her dog was a yellow lab) and for some reason they seemed to move the same way too. She bought sweaters for her dog which were similar in fabric and color as some of her sweaters. The poor dog just puts up with it. The dog really didn’t have a happy face everytime she was wearing a sweater or a costume which was kinda funny. I don’t think that I had a dog that looked like me. My previous dog was a white German Shepherd and he looked like a wolf. I’m only 5’3” so we looked funny together. He was always up to my waist. He looked like he was half horse. I didn’t realize that he was going to get that big when I bought him. A guy went to the bank that I was working at and brought these little GS puppies in a box and was selling them to us. Most of them were brown, some were black and one was white and looked like a baby polar bear. He saw me looking at it and he took it out of the box and put it on my arms. From that moment I couldn’t give the puppy up, I had to have it. I didn’t know anything about German Shepherds but thankfully it turned out well for us. He was an amazing dog and he was so tolerant to our little kids. Now we have a cockapoo puppy and I don’t think that she looks like me either. So amazingly sweet and devoted and she seems to like me more than anyone in our family.

            Birds that talk can be really funny. I remember when I was young there was a little general store where the owner had a parrot that talks. The owner likes to show off and makes the parrot say silly words to us. They also had a pet monkey who got into their cash box and ate their money. The monkey also bit my cousin one time which left an ugly scar on his arm. I can’t remember why the monkey did it. I remember that monkey also liked to remove lice from the heads of the kids in our province and then he eats the lice. They say that the monkey wouldn’t let them leave until all of their head lice are gone. I never went near that monkey though. I was never that brave with unfamiliar animals.

          6. Who cares. It takes repetition at ALL times for a parrot to remember certain statements? I would not bet on that. What a phrase: you are gonna die. I would not be around a bird that repeated that to me. That bird would have to be gifted away.

          7. Violetta says:

            Mommy Pino:
            You sure that dog wasn’t part Great Pyrenees? They get HUGE. And they do look like polar bears.
            Is his nose less pointy than most shepherds?

          8. WhoCares says:


            I agree with you that it may not take repetition all the time – and that the bird would have to be gifted away.
            My grandmother did indeed ‘gift away’ that lorikeet – can you imagine discovering when the bird says it to the new owner?

          9. NarcAngel says:

            That’s it. I’m getting a bird.

          10. WhoCares says:

            NA – Haha..Grandma’s lorikeet also sang the chorus to Stayin’ Alive while bopping it’s to the beat. Not very original but more benign. I can’t help wondering what odd little ditties your bird might pick up, or routine sayings?

          11. NarcAngel says:

            It’s a pretty good bet these would round out the top 5:

            I live for it (my response to any request from my husband)
            Where are my damn glasses?
            An outburst of laughter

          12. WhoCares says:

            NA – haha…maybe you’d get one of those extra bright birds who starts to piece it together:
            “Wtf? Where are my damn glasses?”
            “Bullshit. I live for it. -insert burst of laughter-“

          13. PrincessSuperEmpath says:

            WhoCares: That bird has found a way to travel, although it does not have the freedom to fly: When that bird is ready to move and is ready for a new home and a experience and a new owner, it spews repeatedly to its current owner: You are gonna Die! Then the bird confidently waits to be transported to a new place to live and to a new owner, and to a new experience.

          14. WhoCares says:


            ” That bird has found a way to travel, although it does not have the freedom to fly”

            I hadn’t thought of it that way.
            You have an interesting perspective on things.

        2. MommyPino: People looking like their dogs is a riot. I also like when I see haughty people and their dogs are also haughty. hahaha. People try to pet the dog, and both the dog and the owner look away. But, the dog still wags his tale, because deep down inside, the dog seems to like the attention, and can not stop its tail from wagging anyway. lol.

          1. NarcAngel says:

            People should be aware of the way in which a dog is wagging it’s tail. Tail down and quickly wagging is happy and accepting. Midway or straight and slower is assessing. High and stiff can mean unsure and mounting aggression. These are not 100% in each case but a general guideline as most people think just because the dog’s tail is wagging, that you’re safe. No so.

            I liken it to the behaviour of narcs in the Golden Period, Stranger Zone, and Devaluation. If only they had (visible) tails. For a Mid R you can forget about the tail. It’s generally the one in the corner cowering or dribbling pee on your foot.

          2. NA: hahaha. Interesting info. regarding the various meanings of how a dog wags its tale. Scary too. One could forget the message at the wrong moment, even if one were aware. Cats hunch up their backs and hiss and fluff up their tales and themselves and stand sideways,, at least, all of which is quite a bizarre sight. So, I can tell more easily that the cat is uneasy about something, than by the algebraic equation, etc. of the dog`s tale waving.

          3. Violetta says:


            Look at the dog’s head position also. Head lowered, eyes looking up is bad news. Back off slowly l.

            Head up looking at you with the Lost Puppy Eyes routine means, “You’re loved, now scratch me between my ears and underneath my chin, there’s a good human.”

      3. lisk says:


        Seems like narcs can also smell the empath’s “alarm scent.” Hence why HG says to say “yes” to GOSO and “no” to Grey Rock.

        1. lisk: Empaths smell like Ambrosia to Narcissists. Sweet Perfume. They bathe in us, so to speak. But, they quickly become accustomed to our scent, to the point that they can not smell it and then they need new perfume, at any cost, practically. And we become perfume bottles that they store away, until we refill, or until they desire to come back to the remnants remaining inside, for a while, because our replacement also becomes scentless to them, and so they will stay with us, usually, until a new perfume is found that is stronger to them and thus, more acceptable. Over and Over. It makes Perfect Scents.

          1. Violetta says:

            Bad pun! Bad pun! No treat for you!

          2. Violetta: lol. HG has an article titled: `Perfect Scents.` I did not think of Perfect Scents on my own. We really had fun over there discussing perfume and Creed cologne for men, and things like that, earlier this year, if you ever look for or bump into that particular thread. I often borrow quite a few of his words and phrases. Huzzah!

          3. Violetta says:

            I’ll look it up. Scent can be a deal-maker or a deal-breaker.

    2. zwartbolleke says:


  2. zwartbolleke says:

    I believe empaths and empathy is a trait that in time will disappear. It serves no purpose, when regarded in the light of evolution. Darwinism will only keep narcissism alive.
    We have lost…
    Narcissists always win

    1. Desirée says:

      Not a chance! Where is this sullen demeanor coming from? The ability to self-regulate and recharge is infinitely valuable and most narcissists are dumb and lazy. Doomed to repeat the same patterns over and over again, thus easy to predict. Empathy has survived through over 200 000 years, perhaps even millions and through far more trying times. We will not be shaken.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Hi Desirée, it’s only thinking…
        for the existence of our species, empathy is no longer needed, thus over x-years, I think it will be vanished.

        All leadership is N, empathy serves nothing, on the contrary.
        Already now majority wants to be like the N: become succesful, wealthy, leader, handsome, smart, admired, and most of all: the ability to not care about another in your pursuit of those things.
        Our modern world is evolving towards those qualities being more important than empathy, thus empathy might vanish over time.

        I hope you are right!

        1. santaann1964 says:

          They are not all that like Mr.H don’t confuse your imagination. With Mr.H we can adjust accordingly and understand WHY. Empaths will never disappear, only get stronger. Thank you Mr. H

        2. Desirée says:

          I understand that but there is no need to fear or worry.
          There are plenty of people who have not let their values be impacted by what is pushed by mass media (which I would credit for the promotion of the things you’re describing and that only accounts for a tiny percentage of narcissists) and possess the strength of character to walk their own path. It is possible. There is also no evidence that Empathy is something that can be “bred out” of the gene pool and the narcissistic characters you are describing prefer an empathic partner to support them, hence it would not just be narcissistic people and narcissists procreating.
          I don’t believe Empathy is no longer needed for our species, I think it is more needed than ever.

          1. zwartbolleke says:

            Thank you Desirée!!! 🙂

        3. Sweetest Perfection says:

          Empathy is being taught in schools and colleges now and encouraged in many companies in order to sustain a healthy work environment. Needless to say, narcs can’t survive without Empaths. We, however, can survive without them, many people in this blog are proof of that.

          1. lisk says:

            Sweetest Perfection,

            The teaching of empathy sounds like a good idea, but I cannot help but wonder, keeping in mind HG’s writings: if empathy is being taught in the classroom or in the conference room, are these students simply acquiring Cognitive Empathy?

          2. Sweetest Perfection says:

            Lisk, that is a very intelligent question. In my experience and little knowledge of the topic, most neurotypical people are always taught empathic ways of dealing with others, what we have always called being nice and respectful. Empathic traits in the workplace are those behaviors we used to call norms of etiquette, which seem to be less and less present in the corporate world. For example, ghosting candidates to a job post even after having interviewed them. Practically speaking, you’re not gonna work with them and probably never see them again so if you’re not gonna offer them the job why bother to let them know? Thinking empathically, however, allows you to walk yourself in the other person’s shoes and make the effort, albeit a very unpleasant one, to communicate nicely and respectfully that they have not been selected. Even if it is cognitive empathy it helps make the world more humane. That’s my opinion at least.

          3. Sweetest Perfection says:

            Lisk, I also realized this: in my workplace there is a guy that is obviously a MRN. I’m no expert and I already know he is, so obvious is his case. Both of us have been the boss at different times. When I was the boss, the other employees came to me constantly to consult ideas, offer new proposals for innovation, just talk in general because they felt comfortable… my department grew and blossomed. Now that he is in that position, people come TO ME to complain about his despotic behavior. Most of the employees have left and our department has decreased. I believe narcs can see the logic, but they can’t empathize with people and in most cases, that makes a big difference. Everyone can calculate numbers, but not everyone can do that while keeping people happy, supported, and feeling that they are worth something.

          4. lisk says:

            You’ve got Soft Skillz, SE!

          5. Sweetest Perfection says:

            I’m fun and ultra social. If I could put a karaoke in my workplace, I would!

          6. Lorelei says:

            Sweetest—watching the workplace behavior is really a big focus of mine. I notice how they gravitate to one another and form little alliances, and they appear SO dysfunctional to me—I never saw this before. I’m still in awe at how open my eyes have become. It was so hard at first as I didn’t want to believe how common it is and it’s glaring to me now.

          7. Sweetest Perfection says:

            Lorelei, I know. In my field, that is very common. I have always been very individualistic in that sense and I stay away from cliques, even since I was a kid. That way I don’t have to kiss anyone’s butt, which I am very bat at doing anyway. I hate seeing those flying monkeys around the narc, God, they are so pathetic! On another topic, I’m packing to drive to the beach for 5 days! I know you are not a fan but I can’t wait to be near the ocean.

          8. Lorelei says:

            I’m driving to a beach today. Unfortunately not for pleasure but will attempt to create a normal holiday of sorts. Enjoy!!

          9. Lorelei says:

            Sweetest—I’m a fan of the ocean if I’m not sunning. I’m as pale as it gets—well close. I’m at the ocean now and guess who didn’t have a suitcase upon arrival?? I had to go to a Walmart at midnight and buy absolutely everything down to socks. I was tired and they told me their dressing rooms were empty but they let me in with a sob story as I had no pants/shirt, etc. Walmart is very handy when you have nothing.

          10. Sweetest Perfection says:

            Lorelei, why is Grace Kelly in your avatar?

          11. Lorelei says:

            I am not sure but I like Grace Kelly.

          12. Sweetest Perfection says:

            She was really beautiful but so are you! I prefer your picture.

          13. Violetta says:

            I did a project supervised by our equivalent for Dolores Umbridge. She understood none of the particulars, but by golly she stuck by the finest minutiae of her preferred procedures, even when they didn’t fit the individual case.

            I was initially relieved when she was kicked upstairs.

            Now I found out that my usual supervisor reports to HER.

            When my original supervisor left, he privately told me to get out while I could, because the place was going to down. If it does go down, Dolores Umbridge may see signs that her kind of mismanagement was a major contributing factor, but she will never accept it.

          14. Sweetest Perfection says:

            OF COURSE! My work narc will NEVER accept he is a mediocre negligent useless piece of furniture. But he still is.

          15. zwartbolleke says:

            Amen to that! 🙂

      2. santaann1964 says:

        Correct 💯

      3. NotMe! says:

        That’s interesting Desiree, a self-regulation difficulty is central to most attachment disorders and the more I learn about Narcissism the more I think it is an extreme attachment problem – anxious or ambivalent attachment impacts on personality development and that’s pretty widely accepted. Narcs can’t be happy in their own skin, on their own and can’t self-sooth. The fuel giving a feeling of power that HG talks about seems to be akin to the kind of arousal (not sexual) that children with attachment disorders are constantly seeking, by provoking reactions and pushing boundaries.

        1. Violetta says:

          It’s the soggy potato chip (crisps for you Brits, not the ones that come with fish). Nobody really likes a soggy potato chip, but if it’s that or starve, you’ll take it.

          Kids need attention. They’d prefer positive attention, but if the only time they get attention is when they act up and get the ultraviolence going, that’s what they do.

          By the time they encounter someone who offers them positive attention, they are suspicious and/or contemptuous.

    2. Witch says:

      Hi Zwart,
      I definitely believe empathy is essential to our survival as it allows us to support each other during crisis by forming community. I helped someone recently who I believe is a narc but nonetheless if it wasn’t for my help she would have been out on the street in the rain facing all kinds of risks. If my accommodation burnt down tomorrow I would definitely be dependent on the kindness of others. We evolved to have empathy because forming groups and depending on each other benefited our survival. Without empathy we might as well be reptiles.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Yes Witch but if we use logic, in your example, who helped someone: you. Who was helped: the person you believe to be a N. So…
        The other person (seen in the bigger part as evolution), will more likely survive.

        But I hope you are right!

        1. Witch says:

          Hi Zwart,
          I get your point, however I do have people in my life who would do the same for me.
          The narc mentioned finds it difficult to sustain relationships due to her overbearing personality. She would be hard pressed to find someone who would take her in again if she ended up in a similar situation. Her support system is scarce which puts her at a disadvantage. It depends on the type of narcissist as some are more skilled at manipulation than others. Most end up with a worse fate as they get older. No one wants to be around them.

      2. NotMe! says:

        I agree with you Witch, the human race would have to devolve in order for empathy to be lost. Our evolution has been driven by it, I think. Although HG might say that Narcs have been instrumental in taking the species forward, but then he would ; )

    3. Violetta says:

      Not necessarily. Empaths try harder to keep their kids alive and sufficiently socially-adjusted to mate and produce more empaths.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Ha ha Violetta, let’s hope you are right, however a Narcissistic mother will fight for her children too, as they are her possession and important source of fuel supply.

        1. Violetta says:

          If she doesn’t try to kill them herself, like Salt Mom or Gypsy Rose’s Muchausen-by-proxy mother.

    4. NarcAngel says:

      I don’t think it’s as dark as that. I hope this was just a moment for you and that you don’t either.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Hi NA
        I hope too it’s only a moment of thinking…
        however I don’t see why and how empathy can survive
        (over x-thousands years)

        1. NarcAngel says:

          Re: empathy extinction.

          We don’t really need body hair anymore either but it’s sticking around. I hope that goes before empathy because waxing is expensive.

          1. zwartbolleke says:

            Ha ha ha, oh my god!!

            Well actually, we need body hair more than empathy

    5. lisk says:


      I have wondered about something similar, too. That Empaths are on their way out—-because what does it really get them in the end but a lovely Golden Period (maybe) and then a long (or short, if they’re lucky) ride on a Wheel of Misery?

      By that logic, it would be the end of Narcissists, too, since their supply of fuel will have dried up.

      In which case the world would be a better place, with the Normals having won!

      Ultimately, I doubt that any of this will happen as I wonder.

      The trauma-inducing behavior that plays a big part in the development of the Narcissist and Empath is not about to desist anytime soon.

      1. Lisa: It is true. Many empaths are becoming cold. Many empaths have been carrying this traumatic and heavy and painful burden for a long time, from the way we have been treated, by some of our families and our loved ones and our friends and our coworkers, etc. So, I agree with you. And I am including the empathic men as well. Many of the empathic men as well are becoming cold. I haven`t reached the point of becoming more cold, but I am turning on more sophisticated alarm systems. And that is a good thing for me to do, before it is too late to salvage my true personality and before I end up turning into some form of a mutant.

        1. Sorry, lisk. I said Lisa. We have at least one of each on Narcsite of: Liza and lisk and Lisa, and since I am often posting to one, or the other, or the other, my fingers were confused, but I know in my mind that was I responding to you, lisk. My bad.

      2. zwartbolleke says:

        Hi lisk

        I see the world evolving towards a world that is a perfect place for N.
        We see the succesfull examples of N everyday. Narcissism is tolerated, there is no answer against it, nor legally, nor formally.
        But, I hope you all are right and empathy is not dead!!!

        1. lisk says:

          Maybe GOSO then *is* really the answer.

          Starve narcs of their fuel while you go off to find other empaths/normals and keep the good guys going.

          There definitely good folks out there who’ve had good, loving upbringings—they may be rarer and hard to find at the moment, but they are there for you to find and befriend.

          1. Alexissmith2016 says:

            I’m intrigued to know what people think in terms of those who have had loving caregivers to bring them up. I can only think of a very small handful of the people I personally know. I interact with people from a diverse range of backgrounds. It really does appear to be very few indeed.

          2. Alex: I had loving caregivers, including my Grandparents. It is easy for me to give someone the benefit of the doubt. But, I am becoming tired over time, lately. I have to set up more alarm systems. Because I want to stay healthy, and I want to live as long as possible. What brought me here, workplace Narcissism, was a turning point. I am sure the matter sped up, because I dealt with a Narcissistic group, so the matter was more concentrated, and so I had to really stop, after 3 years straight of it all, and really figure out, what in the world is this madness all about? I found out what it is about : It is about aware and deliberate Border Time, for me. It is time for me to set up many more Borders. And, I have to learn how to do that in the most intelligent manner. Even setting up borders is a skill. How to best go about it. That is what I am learning on Narciste : HOW to best go about setting up borders as well as when to set them up.

          3. Alexissmith2016 says:

            Thanks PSE, I’m very pleased you had a loving family. It honestly really warms my heart to hear that although I am sorry you had to suffer at work. It’s great you’re here and learning though.

            I also had warm and loving grandmothers and I loved spending time with each of them.

            Setting up borders is important. Have things improved for you?

            I’m intrigued, are you an SE? Also what cadre? What kind of people were your parents on the empath/ normal scale if you don’t mind.

            Thanks so much

          4. NotMe! says:

            This idea has puzzled me a bit as I’ve read all HG’s work (or surely most of it by now). I had a loving upbringing too. Sibling rivalry, I remember as one of 5 kids but my mother was an incredibly kind person whom everyone adored. My Father was a grump at times and worked hard, definitely ignored us when we were playing up, but I never thought of him as abusive. He was always supportive of what we wanted to do. My eldest sister is a french fry short of a happy meal and always has been, selfish and manipulative, so maybe a Narc but I don’t think so. I’ve not done an ED as yet, all I know is that N-ex targeted me for some reason and it’s been devastating. I don’t think anyone who knows me would think I’m ‘normal’ so I’m either Narc or an empath – why though? Dunno!

          5. Notme,

            at a guess I would say you’re an empath of some description. You sound thoughtful and caring keen to understand and move on. and if you’re questioning whether you’re an N you’re probably not.

            Your mum sounds lovely and it’s hard to say re your sister but she could well be an N. My sister (on the surface of it) appears to be one of the ‘nicest’ people you could meet and is very easy to get along with. Noone would ever suspect her, I’m sure of it. But having read all of HGs work she is definitely an UMR and married to a LMR so at least as far as IPs go, they have each other and not hurting anyone else in that regard.

            That’s really interesting though that you don’t believe either of your parents were an N. Do you think your mum was an E?

          6. NotMe! says:

            Thank you for your thoughts.
            I don’t think I’m a Narc either really, I take on too much of what other people are feeling at times and have to remind myself to not let them take too much of my energy, that’s always been the case for me. My mother was an empath I believe, although I understand that is subjective. One of my earliest memories of her was her kneeling in the road in white trousers cradling the bleeding head of someone who had been knocked down by a car in her lap. There was never a dull moment with her, there were always people knocking on the door asking for her because of some drama or another. She was a nurse, but it was more than that I’m sure, everyone talked to her and I can’t ever remember her turning anyone away. My 2nd sister Cyn was also that kind of person, who people turn to, and would always respond kindly, even when it was none of her business, you know?

          7. Alex, I constantly say on here that I am ignorant on schools and cadres of both Empaths and Narcs. lol. I marvel that HG sorts though it all. Oh! ~`And I left that job. It hurt, but I am feeling much better in many ways now. I am around 7 months GOSO. Thank you for inquiring. But, I have no friends now. I had not realized that they were all intertwined so much in the overall N. dynamic. So, I also lost a lot of feeling or drive of ambition that one needs. So, it is very different right now. I have a tiny bit of drive coming back, but not nearly enough right now. So I am a little afraid. Having drive is good, and I have very little right now. Maybe I am in a sort of denouement period. I will be glad when it goes away.

          8. NarcAngel says:

            Dealing with Narc and Co every day at work was very draining on you and it takes time to come back to yourself. Everyone is different in the timing. As you regain your energy, your drive will return and you will engage in things that dealing with them left you too tired to enjoy. The connection with other people will come with enjoying those things. You mentioned decorating. Perhaps you could take a course (not online) that will have you engaging with like-minded people and spur your drive on. Pretty soon you will be telling us that PSE Got Her Groove Back.

          9. NA. Thank you. I am ticking off ideas to re-motivate and re-energize myself. But, I may just have to go through this process with time, as well. Whether I like it or not.

          10. alexissmith2016 says:

            PSE, ah I’m not so great with schools and cadres either, esp with Es. I just wondered as you call yourself now PSE. It must have been horrendous at you’re work for you to leave and then find out how many people there are caught up in the whole N dynamic. Well fuck them (not literally of course), you’re much better than they are and they don’t deserve you.

            I’m pleased your spark is returning and it will keep getting brighter. Set backs here and there I’m sure they’re just little stunned but you will get there I promise xxx

          11. Alexissmith2016 says:


            Your mother and sister sound just lovely. You’re incredibly fortunate to have had them around when you were growing up. Just wonderful for you.

            I’m pretty sure one of my grandmothers was a contagion she would have done anything to take someone else’s pain away. Hmmm except if they were being sick, then she’d be sick and my aunt likely a codependent would take over but we’d all laugh about it after. Both beautiful people with the kindest of hearts.

          12. Alex: This is the backstory on the origin of my avatar name selection: When I was very new on Narcsite, I read a Narc tale by HG Tudor. And this rain soaked female entered a castle and her name was Princess Super Empath. I believe it was Sue, instead of Su for the Super part. Maybe it was Princess Sue Per Empath, or something very close. I liked it and I selected the name of this particular leading lady as the inspiration for my avatar name on here: PrincessSuperEmpath.

          13. Alexissmith2016 says:

            Ah gosh! I recall that article PSE. I find it interesting how people chose their names and so many on here do chose a name which has real meaning for them. Really lovely – thank you for sharing x

        2. Liza says:

          your reasoning is subjected to the survivor bias, there are indeed narcissists that succeed, but you only see the ones that succeed, you don’t know about the thousands or may be millions of narcissist that have failled.

          1. lisk says:


            I wonder if zwartbolleke is *also* talking about the narcissists who have failed. Regardless of how unsuccessful in life a narcissist may be, he/she often seems to succeed at doing plenty of damage that might be construed as “winning” by the damaged party.

          2. Liza says:

            by succeeding, i mean the general idea of success, damaging someone’s life is not a real success, it brings damage to the victim, but apart from gaining fuel, there is no real gain for the narcissist.

          3. Violetta says:

            The narcissists themselves don’t think they’ve failed, and that’s the revenge many people want. To have the narcs feel like failures, because that’s how they made us feel.

            Others want to narcs to feel the hurt they’ve done, and learn from it.

            What we need is not to give a shit what the narcs feel, good or bad, except for strategizing to GOSO.

            Wonder if I’ll ever manage it.

          4. Liza says:

            i tooke revenge once in my life, it was in middle school, and i hated the expression that girl made, not only did i not feel any relief, i felt worse than before, so no, i have no interest in having someone else fail, i’d rather consentrate on succeeding, and not let myself be bullied.

          5. Violetta says:

            What she do, how did you get revenge, and was the look she gave a guilt-inducing hurt expression or a terrifying glimpse of the Beast within?

          6. Liza says:

            it was a stupid middle schooler thing.
            we were classmates, she was always the topper, i had always been either 3rd second or 4th, i have never been competitive, and ididn’t care, but she was always picking on me, comparing herselfe to me, and repeating that i could never beat her, so one time i decided to take her place, and the day we got the results, she was crying and looked defeated, and i wasn’t happy, i got it that this first place was verry important for her, it meant nothing for me, i just wanted to prove that i can.

          7. Violetta says:

            I guess she thought it was all she had going for her.

          8. Liza says:

            may be, i don’t really know her we have nerver been close, we have to keep in minde that she was only 13 or 14 at the time.
            any way she got back her top place the next trimester.

    6. Liza says:

      empaths and narcissist will always exist., here is why:
      the peolpe who are called normals, have a healthy mix between empathy and narcissism, enaught empathy to be group oriented and help the species survive, and enaugh narcissism to self preservate, what i’m trying to say is that empathy and narcissism are a part of “normal” they are both already selected traits, empaths and narcissists are anomalies, the dosage of both traits is unbalanced, and anomalies occure with all the other traits.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Good point, thank you Liza! 🙂

        1. Liza says:

          your are welcom, awart 😉

    7. santaann1964 says:

      I they don’t, reality is they never win. Never content always chasing a high on some kind.

    8. MommyPino says:

      Hi Zwart, it does seem like that if I look at the news and see all of the narcissists leading the world. However in my daily life I have only met two narcissist that are successful, they are UMRs. One of them is a family member. And even though he has all of this wealth, he never looks happy. He is very revered and in our family everybody really respects him and has everyone’s attention during family gatherings and everyone laughs at his jokes and he leads the direction of the gathering. However his dynamic with his wife is weird. It seems to revolve around respect and tolerance. He picks on her all the time which I can see sometimes get to her but she just ignores. Unlike my dynamic with my husband and kids where there is always laughter and real happiness even though there were sometimes losing the patience and yelling at the kids or punishing them, the 95% of the time is real genuine happiness. I would not trade that for multiple expensive homes and the power that that couple has. All of the other lower functioning narcissists (including my intelligent MMR half sister) that I have seen have a life that has no direction and has eventually alienated a lot of people because of their inability to empathize and understand that those people are also busy with their own lives and do not revolve around them. They are also usually terrible with money and budgeting with spending more than they could afford.
      Empathy is also a very important ingredient in success as it gives us insight to what other people need or want. An empathic businessman for example will have a very high chance of being able to figure out what kind of service or product is needed by a lot of people. Although for that, highly functioning narcissists like Steve Jobs also do very well because they have high cognitive empathy and sometimes even better cognitive empathy than real Empath’s or normals. So I don’t think that empathy is not needed. If we are all narcissists there will be self destruction in the human race.

      1. zwartbolleke says:

        Well, people like Steve Jobs, that is exactly the problem…
        He has created a monster, together with Zuckerberg and others. Their cognitive empathy was developed to the point to feel and feed the needs of people, to stimulate everybody’s narcissistics traits and make everybody a slave of their narcissistic trait, and what have we now… people craving for likes: see me, like me, I am special, I am better than …
        A totaly crazy world on FB, IG, millions of pictures of faces are shared daily, 75% of all the photo’s (daily) are pictures of faces, can you imagine (I study marketing as a hobby, that’s where I get the numbers)?

        With Mr Tudor only sharing bodyparts, food, snakes, buildings and christmas trees, he is not responsible for this number 😉

        The impact on childrens brains will be massive, but as I have stated in response to everybody: I hope I am wrong! 🙂

        1. MommyPino says:

          I agree. I’m not a fan of them either. Although social media has made it so much easier for me to keep in touch with relatives and friends from afar, I agree that it has made a really big impact on our society and a lot of it are not very good.

  3. Witch says:

    Now that it’s winter I definitely agree.
    My feelings mean my mood changes according to the seasons.
    Receiving barely any sunlight in the morning and seeing gloomy skys makes me not want to get out of bed or leave home.
    I wish I could just hibernate, but bills must be paid *sigh*

    1. Violetta says:

      Have you tried sitting under a plant light on the mornings while you eat breakfast?

      1. Witch says:

        No but thanks for the tip!

        1. Violetta says:

          Don’t do it in the afternoon, however; if it’s effective for you, it could keep you up all night.

          1. Witch says:

            Generally I wish life begun in the afternoon

          2. Mercy says:

            Violetta does this really work? I know someone that had a lamp in her office. She called it her happy lamp. I wonder if it was a plant light.

    2. Liza says:

      if only i could hibernate in summer (summernate?) winter is amazing Witch, evrything looks clean, the colors are simple and beautifull, the sun is rarely here, less dust, less heat.
      if the univers would let me have my way i’ll remove any hot month from the clender, imagine a year without, may jun, july and august

      1. Witch says:

        Imagine a year without summer…Liza I would die!
        I need the vitamin D. I have a vegan/vegetarian diet 99% of the time. My skin looks so much better under the sun. If I lived in a hot country I would very rarely wear any makeup because my skin would forever be tanned and glimmering.

        1. Liza says:

          Hi Witch, i’m sorry to answer only now, i didn’t see your coment.
          there is enaugh vitam D in winter and the sun isn’t so intense, it is more agreable. plus the sun doesn’t like me, i don’t get the nice golden tane, i get burnd and with plenty of moles, it destroyes my objectif of a flawless skin.
          confratulation for the vegan life style, i do not eat meat but i have no merite i don’t like the taste of it, i still eat cheese.

      2. Bibi says:

        I hibernate in summer b/c it is too damn hot where I live. I feel much more alive in the cooler months (where I live. I would not feel the same were I in Alaska).

        Heard an interesting story today on the way to the vet to drop off my cat. A woman in Ohio called 911 and asked for a pizza, wherein the dispatcher at 1st chided her. ‘This is not the number to call if you want a pizza.’

        But the woman insisted. ‘Yes, I would like a pizza. Pepperoni.’ Then she gave the ‘delivery’ address.

        The dispatcher caught on. She was actually calling because her boyfriend was beating up her mother and she was masking the call.

        ‘You need medical?’ He asked.

        ‘Yes, I want a large pizza.’

        The cops came and abuser was arrested. Very clever.

        1. NarcAngel says:

          Bravo to both her and the dispatcher.

        2. WhoCares says:

          That was really awesome to hear. Thanks for sharing Bibi.

          Hope you’re cat is okay.

          1. WhoCares says:

            *your 🐈

          2. Bibi says:

            Thanks for caring, Who Cares. (O the irony! You do care! LOL) Re: My cat. He is doing well. He had some issues a number of weeks ago where he was showing signs of distress (pooping where he should not be and howling and screeching like a banshee in the middle of the night).

            Got him on some meds and he has shown drastic improvement. He is a little rapscallion once again.

          3. WhoCares says:

            Bibi – good to hear.
            “Rapscallion” should be the word of the day – fun!

        3. Lorelei says:

          I heard of this story and it was brilliant of her to stay calm and take care of business. People in Ohio rule.:)

          1. Violetta says:

            Are you from Ohio, Lorelei? Or if you’ve just visited, what area are you most familiar with?

          2. Lorelei says:

            Not from Ohio but college landed me in the mid-west! Familiar with central Ohio mostly.

  4. Pingback: The Futility Of Your Feelings ⋆ NarcTopia
  5. Pati says:

    Emotions vs Fuel, thank you for the explanation HG.

  6. privatejourney60 says:

    HG and team, Grateful for pinching me.

  7. lisk says:

    Loud and clear.

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous article

The Cookie Jar

Next article

The Gift