Q&A Access 26th April 2020

Q_26A_20Access_202020

 

If you missed the Q&A and want to access it to find out what was asked and more importantly, what the many,many juicy answers were, then all you need do is obtain this and ts will provide you with the relevant password and link to enable you to enter the forum and read everything that has been posted so you can be informed and entertained. Over 450 questions and answers covering the many aspects of the narcissistic dynamic, where HG Tudor currently is, whether he has plans for retirement, dealing with narcissists at work, useful information for the Clue Hunters, understanding narcissistic indicators and lots lots more.

Obtain access information here for just US$ 7.50

5 thoughts on “Q&A Access 26th April 2020

  1. Claire says:

    It is a pure delight reading the Q&A 🙂👍🏻!
    Who needs chocolate /drink/ snow or other junk when you can enjoy the Q&A transcript instead ?
    Very entertaining and educational material, thank you HG for the swift publishing!

    1. HG Tudor says:

      You are welcome Claire. If you would like some further juicy reading/listening, there is a new part to the Knowing HG series. It has MB shaking!

      1. Claire says:

        This ( the new part to the Knowing HG) is going to be my evening treat , HG🙂!

        1. HG Tudor says:

          HG approves.

  2. Lorelei says:

    I just read it—I didn’t attend because I’m working all weekend and required some rest. Anyway, a really good question was asked about child oriented matters and narcs. That if we give a little to settle them down they may well feel in control, but the control may need more from us later down the road. (legally speaking—re, children) So, once again, the empath or normal must make concessions potentially on child related matters to avoid a headache potentially. The salami slicing continues essentially. Are the repercussions to just hammering down with feet planted ever more beneficial than potentially dancing the narc dance over and over in terms of negotiations? Would the firm as fuck stance approach prevent more salami slicing? They don’t recognize boundaries so how would this (potentially very firm) challenge influence future challenge potential for many mids?
    I kept thinking of ANM over the weekend and the tiresome situation. I hate to see this. I feel quite fortunate because of my ex’s behavior pattern. It used to be more embarrassing, but it’s a priceless gift in all actuality. He’s digging his own grace with narcissism as his shovel. (It’s been hinted that even his own attorney knows he’s disordered) I ask because of future manipulations when his fuel matrix suffers a leak. I’m more than capable of managing the best direction now with little to no emotional consequence. There has been an incredible disengagement from emotional impact—I see the zero in the impact which I have been in reach of but not grasped. It’s nearly there by having implanted him in my mind as a forensic entity, but I still have to protect the kids because he’s toxic and causing them harm. If he ever attempts to change the agreement is it best to nail him with any and all? Or make him think he’s gaining? Or is this too dependent on circumstances? I’m already not nailing him for money. (which I could but I’m trying to protect my children) My brothers take care of things so I don’t have to ruffle his feathers for now. So, do we allow the salami slicing in the courtroom a little here or there? Or no contact no attention and no concessions?

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.