Meghan Markle : A Less Than Royal Narcissist Part 15

7 thoughts on “Meghan Markle : A Less Than Royal Narcissist Part 15

  1. Em says:

    Has she even apologised for or acknowledged these bullying accusations

  2. Em says:

    Brilliant HG.
    Makes it so clear.
    Doesn’t it seem strange that the pre release snippets from the Oprah event seem to demonstrate MM does actually know what the problem is?
    She seems to be flailing around blaming everyone. BP HMTQ Kate and William the press the British people. And yet they chose to leave coz they didn’t get what they wanted half in half out deal. It seems so weird how the narrative seems to change all the time. We want privacy. Then appear for 2 hrs on TV in USA?? What’s that about?
    How will this end?

    1. HG Tudor says:

      1. Compartmentalisation.
      2. The need to control in the NOW.
      This is what causes the inconsistent (from your perspective) behaviour. The narcissist is blind to it.

      1. Em says:

        Ah yes

  3. lickemtomorrow says:

    It’s interesting that she thought the Royal family had not acted to protect her as we can see them now removing all protections by allowing an investigation to go ahead into alleged bullying accusations. It’s more likely, in that instance if proven, they protected her too much.

    1. Violetta says:

      Saw a video by a former editor at Star suggesting that she WANTED to be rejected by the palace. That was the narrative she had prepared.

      1. lickemtomorrow says:

        WOW, Violetta! That could potentially make sense to some people, but it would be stretching the ordinary imagination of most people to go there. You have to wonder what made the former editor suggest that. I’m not sure being an unaware mid-range narc that Meghan Markle could orchestrate such a complex narrative, and I’m not sure what the editor is basing that on. Was it prior to or after the marriage she ‘expected’ to be rejected? I feel like she was already crying foul before they got married, so maybe that is part of where this thinking is coming from. Also, was her own rejection of Royal protocol seen as a desire on her part to fashion that rejection? Or was it just the mid range narciness that got everyone into this mess? This is complex, and you could come at it from many different angles, none of them able to make it clear and all dependent on your own perspective. We know what she is. Would she have the capacity to turn the monarchy on its head in any kind of deliberate attempt to sow seeds of discord? If her behaviours are instinctive, which we know they are as a mid range narcissist, I think the rejection was going to come either way in the circumstances and from both parties. It’s the nature of her narcissism more than anything else, along side that of the others involved. That would be my opinion and, with what HG has so aptly explained up to now, I think the former editor might need to back off some of her potential ‘conspiracy theories’. Of course she doesn’t have HGs analysis and, much like the many other stories in the press he has been able to apply his outstanding knowledge to, an awareness of the underlying factor of narcissism can change everything. Another reason to keep spreading the word! I’d love to see that video, btw 😉

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.