Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
3 thoughts on “Appeal Court Judgment- Meghan Markle”
RE: Harry’s Wife Pt 89.9 Piers V Harry’s Wife
I thought to myself, did Piers ‘feel’ the need to start ‘attacking’ her partly because he ‘wanted’ to ‘rub her nose in it’ after how she put him through an official investigation? Hence him coming out and doing what he did as a result of her ‘win’ against the privacy case v the press?
Laughing…..”oh please this is right up there with Bill Clinton’s I did not have sexual relations with that woman Miss Lewinsky”.
Harry already had a ‘hatred’ of the press simply because of his mother’s death and the events that led right up to it. For two-thirds of his life, he has ‘carried’ this unresolved ‘inner fury’. He is aware of this ‘hatred’ he has because he has voiced it over and over. Now that he is married to her, she has ‘encouraged’ him to ‘utilise’ his hatred further by slapping lawsuits here and there on the press & privacy ‘concerns’.
Narcissism tends to cause it’s ‘owners’ to ‘select’ people that ‘dare’ to challenge their threats to their control. If someone is nice to ‘them’, they are painted white.
I suppose, for as long as Prince Harry is married to her, Piers will also be “married” to her too, or at least one of them dies unless she goes off the ‘radar’ from the Press, the Public and Piers (probably highly unlikely at this rate ;-)). Laughing at my thought ‘how often will Piers ‘smack’ her down?’.
‘Selected’ amnesia, blame-shifting and re-writing of history is what I found to be very common with the narcissists at work. Including narcissists ‘colliding’.
Piers is probably furious that she ‘won’ because, in his perception, she is ‘attacking’ him indirectly because he is a journalist himself, and he knows she is a liar. Has he ‘forgotten’ that he beat her, he should have gloated about this (RE: HG’s article ‘The Narcissist Manipulates : Digging Up The Past’).
Thank you for this video, HG 🙂
Appreciate the analysis, HG, and the law will frustrate us at times meaning justice is not always done. In this case, I think it matters not that she has secured her win – remembering she had already won – because the appeal allowed her to be exposed as the liar that she is, which people won’t easily forget. It’s also a confirmation of what many believe. She is constantly being shown up to be a hypocrite and a liar.
Her gag-worthy, triumphalist response to the Court’s decision also shows her up for what she is, being typically grandiose. She thinks and acts as though she is some kind of saviour, when the reality is all that she is doing is seeking to suppress any negative press about her. In some ways it’s fascinating to watch how the narcissism utlizes opportunities to create an impression of altruism, when it’s really only and always about the narcissist.
Thank you for doing this video, HG. Much appreciated.