H.G Tudor - Fury e-book cover

Fury is present in all narcissists.

Why does he lash out at you, abuse, assault and insult?

Why do you get ignored and cold-shouldered?

Why does he walk off and disappear?

Here is the answer.

By understanding fury, what causes it and what purpose it serves you will unlock a fundamental element of the narcissistic dynamic.

What is fury? Why is it something beyond anger in a certain group of individuals? Where does this it come from and what is it used for? What ignites it and what is your part in this ignition? What does this ignited fury do and why? Why does it never recede? Ascertain whether people in your life suffer from it and what does it mean. Why does the narcissist cultivate it and how is it used against his or her victims? What can you do about it and its effects? These questions and more are answered in a revealing expose of the fury of the narcissist.

US e-book here

UK e-book here

CAN e-book here

AUS e-book here

Understand more with “Outrageous”

KTN Fury Book Teaser




27 thoughts on “Fury

  1. BC30 says:

    Ya’ll are a hot mess and I love it! I love coming back and seeing everyone having a great time.

  2. WhoCares says:

    fury (n.)
    late 14c., “fierce passion,” from Old French furie, fuire “rage, frenzy” (14c.), from Latin furia “violent passion, rage, madness,”…

  3. WhoCares says:

    Wow, interesting flavour of crazy.

    I didn’t think anyone could trump my ex.

  4. Asp Emp says:

    Laughing……..fooking hilarious, HG.

    The Delusions. The magical thinking. The deflections. The ignorance. FFS.

  5. NarcAngel says:

    Pffft…..I’m not afraid of Italians.

    1. HG Tudor says:

      Nor should you be, they are usually going in reverse.

      1. Asp Emp says:

        Gino D’Acampo is a very proud Italian, even more so when he wear his specially named sporran that he obtained when he was in Scotland….. just sayin’.

  6. Pingback: Fury - Dark Triad Personality
  7. Pamela Swain says:

    Don’t drive angry.

    1. A Victor says:

      Haha, logic. Surprise!

      1. Pamela Swain says:

        Hello Alicia.

    2. Violetta says:

      Don’t post narcy.

      Unless you’re HG.

      1. Pamela Swain says:


        1. Violetta says:

          Um, the guy whose blog this is?

          Perhaps you’ve forgotten, in the excitement of behaving as if it were yours.

          1. Pamela Swain says:

            No idea what you’re talking about.

          2. Pamela Swain says:

            I have documents to prove Clinton blackmail. Don’t address me again or stalk me again. Italicize that.

          3. Violetta says:


          4. Asp Emp says:

            Violetta, I applaud you. I loved what you did (laughing).

          5. Violetta says:

            Asp Emp:

            Narcsite inspires me in so many ways.

    3. Alexissmith2016 says:

      HG, I understand Ns do this sort of thing for fuel, but I still don’t really get it? Do they tend to do this more when fuel supplies are low?

      1. HG Tudor says:

        Do what?

        1. Duchessbea says:

          Self combust?

          1. A Victor says:

            Haha DB! Good one!!

        2. Alexissmith2016 says:

          Hahah oh dear, sorry about that HG, I knew what I was talking about in my head but didn’t relay it terribly well.

          When someone like Pamela comments on your blog and purposely attempts to antagonise people, is this because fuel supplies are low? I just struggle to make sense of this, what possible ‘enjoyment’ could someone get from upsetting people they’ve never met and never will. As you say, fuel from in person contact is the most satisfying or even thought fuel regarding a primary/secondary source. Surely thought fuel from comments to/from tertiary sources over the internet is very low, so why bother? I therefore wondered whether it was because fuel supplies are low. Thank you very much.

          1. HG Tudor says:

            She is seeking to assert control directly however because she is an epsilon semi-moron, her narcissism takes her to doing so in a rudimentary, obvious and abrasive fashion.

        3. Alexissmith2016 says:

          I’m unable to reply to your comment directly HG but brilliant – thank you very much.

      2. Truthseeker6157 says:


        “Do they tend to do this more when fuel supplies are low?”

        I think it might be a bit like Piers Morgan with HW. HG might well be popping up on Pamela’s radar via suggested videos on YouTube, or similar. The narcissism asks “Is this person under control?” Answer “No”. So our friend is prompted to attempt to assert control directly via the blog.

        I’ve wondered also if fuel levels dictate the selection of first (direct assertion) or third (remaining in withdrawal) assertion of control. I would guess yes. Lower fuel levels would logically encourage a direct assertion of control.

        Historically, Pamela’s comments do get posted, (likely not all of them). In terms of a hoover, the execution criteria are therefore likely met. So she goes ahead with the hoover.

        In terms of fuel received, as a minimum, there is the thought fuel from the fact that HG read the comments.

        The best case is if HG responds but he is still only a tertiary source with low potency fuel (written word) low regularity (he often ignores the comment).

        It looks like HG is popping up on the radar somewhere along the line. That would be my best guess.


Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.