Knowing the Narcissist : Sex and the Narcissist

H.G Tudor - Sex And The Narcissist e-book cover.jpg

No holds barred and no strings attached

The only unnatural sex act is that which you cannot perform

Read about how the narcissist views and uses sex and how you are central in that

US e-book here

UK e-book here

CAN e-book here

AUS e-book here

Also available in paperback on Amazon

This is classified as adult material and search filters may need adjustment.

One thought on “Knowing the Narcissist : Sex and the Narcissist

  1. Dani says:

    Mr. Tudor–

    I’ve watched various videos about sex and the narcissist and many about narcissistic indicators/behaviours. I know that some narcissists, but not all, are sexually fluid. They change their sexuality to meet the needs of the prime aims. This doesn’t mean that everyone who is bisexual (or anything other the heterosexual) is a narcissist. There are empaths, normals, narcissistic people, and narcissists of every sexuality. You’ve helped empaths/victims escape from all kinds of entanglements.

    Just using asexual as an example (I saw a book about it this week)

    When books are published calling something like asexuality a spectrum, I can understand to a point. I can understand asexual people having sex for reproductive purposes or because they feel pressured by a romantic partner to do so or because it’s “normal” and they want to feel “normal.” I understand that they don’t feel sexual attraction or they don’t have a sex drive in the way that the majority of the human population does. Sometimes this is the result of sexual abuse in childhood or being the victim of sexual violence as an adult, and sometimes it isn’t. I can understand asexual people being married and having a loving relationship (without coitus). I can understand that there are asexual people who never get married or have relationships that extend beyond friendship. I can understand there is a spectrum of behaviors associated with asexual people.

    But I find it perplexing to see books claiming this spectrum of asexuality includes people who are sex-positive and/or engage in multiple sexual relationships. To me that dilutes what asexuality is by definition, “never or rarely feels sexual attraction OR little or no desire for sexual relations.” I’ve heard phrases from some asexual people saying “sex is just an activity” while also claiming “if you don’t want to have sex or don’t feel attracted to the other person, what’s the point?” I’ve also met someone who was “pansexual” and “asexual” within the course of the same conversation. (No, I still haven’t figured that one out.)

    1. Is it a strong narcissistic indicator for someone to say they are asexual while being in multiple sexual relationships? If the relationships are all between a male and a female, at what point does a rational person conclude the individual is heterosexual? (The same holds true for two males, two females, and those who switch it up.)
    2. Would the cadre of the narcissist involved in this type of behaviour (multiple partners while saying they’re asexual) most likely be a somatic/elite?
    3. Is it likely to be narcissists or narcissistic people who want such broad spectrums for a term that it seems to include everyone? (They get to do what they want (have sex with lots of people) then go to a “victim” status meetings and assert control over people who don’t understand their sexuality.) or is it likely to be genuine compassion from empaths even when the behaviors of individuals “meeting the criteria” can appear or just be (in my mind) contradictory to the definition?
    5. Are the majority of narcissists highly likely to jump between which victim status they want to have? e.g. “People just don’t understand pansexual.” or “No body understands asexual.”

    Thank you so much for your time. Much appreciation.

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.