The Truth About Flying Monkeys
Narcissists invariably use “Flying Monkeys” don’t they?
It is about time you learned the truth about them in this extensive breakdown which will leave you stunned by HG Tudor´s revelations about them.
A massive injection of logic which will leave you heartened and encouraged.
The material tackles the following topics amongst others :-
– Do Flying Monkeys actually exist?
– What are Lieutenants, how do narcissists use them and how are they influenced
– What is the Coterie, how the narcissist uses The Coterie and how it impacts on you as the victim
– The role of Emotional Thinking in affecting your perception of Flying Monkeys
– Information about this phenomenon to dispel myths and improve your state of well being
– The different forms of The Coterie so you are better able to recognise which one is being used against you
– Information which assists your No Contact Regime
– Who really relies on the term “Flying Monkeys” and why, the answer will surprise you.
Unrivalled information which has aided many already and to achieve freedom from the narcissist, a small price for valuable information.
7 thoughts on “The Truth About Flying Monkeys”
Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Hello HG,
A few questions if you have time please.
You have said previously that more people read the blog than comment on the blog.
1. Am I to assume that roughly one in six of those reading the blog regularly but not commenting, are narcissists?
2. If a narcissist reading the blog regularly but not commenting, took a dislike to a blog commenter, what would be the likely reason for the dislike?
3. Could the narcissist’s control be threatened even though the commenter has not interacted with the narcissist directly?
4. If a narcissist reading the blog regularly but not commenting, took a dislike to a blog commenter, what would be the likely response by this narcissist?
1. The percentage of unaware narcissists reading the blog may actually be higher than the stated figure, given that many of them will (because of their narcissism) believe they are VICTIMS of narcissism and they will therefore be attracted to this material.
2. The commenter will have written something which offends the narcissist´s need for control.
3. Yes.
4. If they are not moved to comment which would be a hoover and the direct assertion of control, they may complain about that individual elsewhere (in effect smearing and the second assertion of control) or most likely think ill of the commenter an jettison them (third assertion of control, staying in a position of withdrawal).
Thank you for the explanation HG. I originally thought that a blog interaction would have to take place for control to be threatened. Thinking about social media in general though, I can see how threats to control might occur.
I was also forgetting we are in a hunting ground. On the bright side, said hunting ground is owned by an apex predator.
I probably feel much better now!
Hi TS,
I used to think of HG like a Great White, or even a megladon….now I think of HG like an Orca, apex predator that can take down a Great White, eat its liver and move on…..and look how nice they look….until you piss them off and they grab you by the foot and drown you….yeah, I will stay out of the ocean, thank you very much….Free Willy, indeed. Xx
Speaking of hunting ground:
There is this person named grunzo who attacked me for commenting on the Vac attack video. I looked him up. He has a few friends and a few electronica videos- looks like a catfish to me. He defended Sam throughout the comments not just mine. Only him. lol
He said I liked “ pop psychology” over “true Academia”. ( A smear against HG); then he said HG has “colonized my mind”. Odd term for a young dude.He said since HG has colonized my mind, I give HG a pass and not Sam even though HG has victims too and HG didn’t participate in the film as he is a coward and his victims would be identified too.
I responded setting forth the evidence I saw and heard as to Sam. I asked him where the evidence was against HG. ? None. I said I deal with evidence not speculation or conjecture. ( a typical lawyer response).
But I think Sam is behind it if not writing it.
All you need to ask that fanboy is what does he think of his “hero” sobbing like a big gay baby in the film. Pathetic.
Excellent information in this. Everyone involved with a narcissist needs to buy it.