th8N99KGUWI have a fascination for inanimate objects. Show me a beautiful watch with its intricate mechanism on display and I shall sit transfixed for a long time admiring the craftsmanship in this creation. I like to touch one of my favourite suits relishing the sensation of the cloth. I will hold it up pleased with the way it hangs and then of course admire how I wear it in the mirror. A sculpture, a painting, a car or a piece of jewellery. They all invite my admiration. They are items of beauty and superiority and as such firmly belong in my world. Moreover, they do exactly what I want. I love my dishwasher. It always works. I press the buttons and it obeys my commands, quietly churning away as it removes the residue from the expensive crockery. The glassware comes out shining, without streaks or marks. Each and every time. Objects are reliable. They perform as I require them to perform. I love nothing more than an appliance. It complies, it obeys and it delivers. I love possessions.

I love to possess you and make you an inanimate object. That is how I see you. You are an appliance which I expect to do as I demand.You are but an extension of me, placed here to carry out my demands and whims. I like to attach brand names to my ex-girlfriends. Becky was Zanussi – she was good at science, thus she was the appliance of science. Sarah was Nike since I had to tell her to Just Do It.(she called me Burger King – have it your way, I quite liked her).Another was Energizer as she kept going and going and going (but that’s another tale). I like to think I am Tag Heuer (Success. It’s a Mind Game).I objectify everybody and assess how they can be a good appliance to me. Once that is done I have to acquire the appliance. I have possession of you and you must act as I dictate. All my other possessions do, so why should you be any different?

22 thoughts on “Possession

  1. nikitalondon says:

    Hey! I am the only one!! 😘😘

  2. twinkletoes says:

    I thought I was the only one, HG! 💋

  3. Elizabeth says:

    Show me a 5 million dollar cottage (paid for) with my name and my name alone on the deed… and let the games begin, it will cost you to F with my head. Hunt big game? Hate sex … Fuel-empaths like it too.

  4. 2mpathetic says:

    Mr. HG,
    Hope this post finds you well. Your post was great at showing how your appreciation for the appliance to function as you see fit is imperative. I will thus keep that to the fore. This question does not pertain to your post, sorry but i didnt know where to place it. I read last night in your book that the case that was presented to you by professor’s T and Z (i think) involved a stab wound and a refusal of treatment, could you please say what opinion of the two you supported? Thanks HG.
    The behaving brave little toaster.

    1. HG Tudor says:

      Why do you want to know? Have you an essay to write?!

      1. 2mpathetic says:

        Stab or refusal was cause. Intesesting topic. Opinion. go!
        OK go pleaaassseee? 😍😘😗

        1. HG Tudor says:


          1. 2mpathetic says:

            Evasion. I like that answer. can b taken multiple ways and i will steal it from u. Did u get my email yesterday?

          2. HG Tudor says:

            I shall be checking e-mails later, I have not had opportunity to do so yet.

          3. 2mpathetic says:

            Check out @outofthebox2222’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/outofthebox2222/status/753100113514463232?s=09
            Could it be? Really?

  5. Oh – I thought you were a Rolecs ?

    1. HG Tudor says:

      Or even a Rolex!

      1. Well a Rolecs is like a Rolex but it’s the cheap imitation version. Looks real pretends to be real. But it doesn’t take long before it malfunctions. The Rolecs unlike the genuine article very sadly can’t be repaired. Though many keep trying to fix it.

        I know you love me HG 💋💋💋

        1. HG Tudor says:

          Good recovery there Alexis, of course I love you,you are the only one.

          1. Always xxx

  6. Lisa says:

    HG why do you let go of the appliances , even though you talk of hoovers etc , eventually you do discard forever ? Do you often go through break ups and getting back together ? How many times do you think a N will do that before the final discard forever ?

    1. HG Tudor says:

      We let go because they do not function to the extent that we require. We do not discard forever. The only escape is death. Of course, you can minimise the risk of hoover rather considerably by staying out of the spheres of influence as I have written previously. We hoover because the hoover fuel is so good. If there is a chance to do this, we will do it.

      1. Lisa says:

        HG when you say the only escape is death . Can you explain this please . So let’s say , the appliance is not offering what you want , there’s a few hoovers but it’s over eventually . Otherwise a narc would have no exes . The ex appliance could be moved on , married and not received a Hoover for years . The N has moved on . Therefore why does it take death to be over ? Does this just simply mean the narc continues to think about the appliance ? How can it not be over ? If years have gone by . But your both not dead ?

        1. HG Tudor says:

          We regard you as bound, “contracted” with us for all time until one of us dies, hence the comment. Just because we might be with someone else and you might does not mean it is over. There remains always the potential for a hoover until either of us dies, it depends on several factors one of which is whether you enter one of our spheres of influence.

          1. Lisa says:

            HG , since we are bound to you until we die. How many exactly , only the ones that were long term girlfriends , and you said I wasn’t even the public girlfriend . What about the one night stands the brief ones lasting 2 or 3 months . All of them ? There could be hundreds ? Also do you keep a check on old ones that are not in your life anymore ? How do you know they are not dead ? What if you see one from 5 years ago and no longer find her attractive ha ha

          2. HG Tudor says:

            All are bound in our minds although it will be the ones we formed relationships with (not the one night stands) who are more likely to be hovered than one night stands. The one night stands provide fuel and may be used to triangulate with the primary source, but the one night stands are nor primary sources. They are secondary or tertiary sources and they are far less likely to be hovered. Instead we are more likely to find somebody who is a secondary or tertiary source and use them as someone afresh for this limited purpose, rather than return to someone who was briefly used some time ago. So it is not a case of keeping a check on hundreds of former secondary and tertiary sources but rather picking them up, using them and dropping them before finding a new one. It is the primary sources who are returned to.

      2. The convalescent codependent says:

        I am becoming aware of this, though I do struggle with some denial accepting it fully.

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous article

Insidious Ease