Harry’s Wife: The Netflix Tapes

20 thoughts on “Harry’s Wife: The Netflix Tapes

  1. Asp Emp says:

    I started laughing when I read “Queen’s simple two-word response to Meghan and Harry’s plea to photograph Lilibet meeting” (The Mirror 08/06/2022).

    1. Viol. says:

      HM is unfailingly decorous. The situation merited a “Fuck off,” or at least a “Hell, no.”

      1. Asp Emp says:

        Exactly. That is why I made a comment about it 🙂 There are lots of two-word variations that could apply, the Queen may mutter a couple yet think of many.

      2. WiserNow says:

        I imagine the Queen would say something more like, “one objects” or “regretfully, no”.

        There’s something to be said for direct communication though 😉

        Makes me wonder what the difference is between ‘decorous’ and ‘passive-aggressive’…

        1. Viol. says:

          “No chance”–or any less printable option–does sound more like Princess Anne.

          Passive-aggression generally requires a kind of double-think: “But I was only trying to help!.” I think the RF and the British upper-class in general are well aware of when they are politely telling someone to get stuffed.

          1. Asp Emp says:

            Viol, I recall seeing Prince Philip saying (or, rather, snapping at) to the effect of “Stop faffing around and take the picture” in regard to a photographer during a photo shoot.

          2. WiserNow says:

            Viol.
            Her Majesty would be much more circumspect when communicating with Harry’s wife than to say anything that’s not printable, I believe.

            There is also the possibility of cognitive bias when it comes to what is or what isn’t ‘passive-aggression’. To some, a ‘commoner’ is common no matter what they do, while a member of the ‘upper-class’ is refined or noble no matter what they do. Both are subjective views.

            For example, if I was to say that Queen Elizabeth’s astrological chart is interesting, those who don’t believe astrology has meaning would dismiss my views. That is their prerogative.

            I think the Queen’s date of birth (21 April 1926) is interesting though because her sun sign falls on the cusp between Aries and Taurus, just falling into Taurus in the third house. The sun in a chart signifies a person’s personality traits that visible to others. Taurus is a fixed sign ruled by Earth. Some characteristics of Taurus sun signs are: stability, consistency, reliability, tenacity, and they don’t shy away from hard work or the need to get the job done.

            Meanwhile, having the sun in Aries is said to give external traits of ambition, assertiveness, bravery, honesty and optimism.

            The Queen’s chart also shows her Ascendant sign is Capricorn, making the ruling planet of her chart Saturn. Saturn is all about longevity, perseverence, and the recognition that life has restrictions and limitations. Saturn is said to be a hard taskmaster, but once a person ‘learns’ how to live with the lessons, Saturn provides great rewards.

            Other planetary placements are also interesting. The Queen’s moon is in Leo and her Mars is in Aquarius in the first house.

            I think Her Majesty’s astrological chart is very apt to her life and her character. But of course, for those who dismiss astrology as nonsense, it doesn’t mean anything.

  2. Bubbles says:

    Dear Mr Tudor,
    Hilariously bloody brilliant 😂🤣
    Thank you
    Luv Bubbles xx 😘

    1. HG Tudor says:

      You are welcome.

  3. Viol. says:

    HG, now that the Jubilee celebrations are over, will you be turning your attention across the pond to.our January 6th hearings? Among the insurrectionists, the politicians who bailed on Trump as well as those who stuck by him, plus the opponents tut-tutting about it in their statements, it’s a narc feeding frenzy. If this were a beach instead of a government, it would be permanently closed.

    1. HG Tudor says:

      I shall consider this.

      1. Viol.. says:

        I hope you enjoyed (en-Fueled? You don’t do joy) whatever you did after all your work during the Jubilee. The extensive analysis you provided on both media coverage and video footage merits a thorough holiday (vacation to us colonials). The play-by-play on St. Paul’s steps alone was a master-class in gridiron football defense.

        1. HG Tudor says:

          Thank you

  4. WiserNow says:

    “A damaged memory card from a recording device was found wedged into a banana of empowerment at Frogmore Cottage.”

    …announced in a gravely serious tone of voice.

    HG, you are funny! Thank you for the laughs.

  5. Asp Emp says:

    This was pure class. The sound effects that I was hearing while I was laughing was ‘WTF’ but I could not stop laughing. Absolutely hilarious. I loved it. It is excellent, HG. You are really talented, it does not matter what you talk about, how it is delivered, you are just AWESOME. Thank you for being you 🙂 xxx

    1. HG Tudor says:

      You are welcome.

      1. Asp Emp says:

        🙂

  6. WhoCares says:

    Still hilarious! Every time I listen…the range of voices you can do, HG, is impressive.

    1. Viol. says:

      The combined nasal/glottal/whining on his Wifey impression is just plain scary.

      1. WhoCares says:

        Haha!

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.