Prince Andrew : It Won´t Go Away

21 thoughts on “Prince Andrew : It Won´t Go Away

  1. Violetta says:

    So according to the DM, Andrew threw tantrums–as a grown man–if staff moved the teddy bears in his room.

    🎵If you go in Andrew’s room today, you’d better not go alone
    It’s lovely in Andrew’s room today, but safer to stay at home
    For every bear that ever there was
    Will gather there for certain because
    Today’s when Andrew’s teddy bears have their picnic
    🎶

  2. Foreigner74 says:

    Hello H.G. Happy new year! With the (more or less) Royal Narcissists series, you got me hooked on the British monarchy. I have noticed that you pay close attention to the use of royal and noble titles. I don’t know if it’s because of your innate accuracy or if the royal environment is familiar to you for other reasons. I guess this is a topic for the Knowing H.G discussion forum. But could you please explain to me why Catherine Middleton is not Princess of Wales? Thank you

    1. HG Tudor says:

      Because Prince William is not the Prince of Wales.

      1. Foreigner74 says:

        I see… and why is she not a Princess since she’s married to a Prince?

        1. HG Tudor says:

          She was not of royal birth and therefore is not automatically a princess. Charlotte, her daughter is and thus she is Princess Charlotte, but Kate is “a commoner”. She gains the formal title of her husband and since William was made Duke of Cambridge, she became Duchess of Cambridge.

          You may have heard me in my videos, correct publications who refer to Diana as Princess Diana. She was never Princess Diana, she was the Princess of Wales (because Charles is Prince of Wales and she married him, thus taking that title) but she was not born a princess. Thus, her correct title was Diana, Princess of Wales, not Princess Diana. Unfortunately, the public took to calling her Princess Diana and accordingly the error created the belief that she was Princess Diana, but she was not. Diana could have been called Princess Charles taking the title from her husband, in the way Kate could be Princess William but neither chose to do this (see Princess Michael of Kent who did choose to do this, she is actually called Marie)

  3. A Victor says:

    This man is so horrible, this entire situation is so horrible, the epitome of abuse to so many innocent victims, the hiding of it, it’s disgusting. I don’t know how the non-narcs who are helping him can live with themselves. Great breakdown HG, as always.

  4. Chihuahuamum says:

    Welcome back HG!! Hope your holidays were amazing🤗 Great article!!
    I’m glad Prince Andrew was stripped of his duties, but that is just a slap on the wrist. Once Jizz Maxwell discloses some of the clients of Epsteins the heat may be turned up even more. Of course he will be untouchable, but it’ll be good to watch him squirm. The way he has been so cockey about the case is disgusting. His interview was a laughing stock joke. He’s an incredibly bad liar.
    I do wonder if he may have been molested as a child because most times the cycle repeats and the victim goes on to molest another. Not always tho. The royal family had that creep friend of Charles around. I can’t remember his name.
    I do question if the monarchy should be abolished. Do their duties govern the status and vast amounts of money they get. Were no longer back in the 1500s. Maybe it’s time to end the monarchy. It’s a fascinating history, but does it serve the people??? The monarchy in many ways is the epitome of npd. What makes them so above anyone else? I could be off base, but these are questions that i have.
    Prince Andrew looks the image of his great grandmother. She was a raging narcissist clepto. Anything she wanted she got and stole! Many of these royal family members feel entitled, but are they entitled?
    I think the UK should have a vote whether to keep them in place or not. It’s only fair as it is THEIR hard earned money that does so!
    As for the prince boo hoo cry me a river! Face the music like a man, except he isn’t a man he’s still mommy’s golden child hiding behind her status as Queen. The only two i don’t think are narcissists are Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge. Maybe Harry has the right idea to jump ship and reinvent himself. Altho he did so with the wrong person.
    At the end of the day i don’t think anything can touch Prince Andrew in a criminal action sense. Too much money and status behind him very much like a certain orange faced turd i despise.

    1. Witch says:

      @ Chihuahuamum
      I believe the royal family does generate a lot of income through tourism. The royal family serves as a link to English history that maintains peoples interest in the country.
      Who would really want to come to visit England if it didn’t maintain it’s cultural identity?
      Prince William is a normal and Kate is a an empath, they might be the key to less Narcs being in the line of succession

      1. Chihuahuamum says:

        Hi Witch… yes i do realize they generate income through tourism etc I don’t know the full extent. It is just something i have thought about and have seen others post about as well. I do love the history and traditions of the royal family!

  5. Alexissmith says:

    Incredibly interesting to hear how he’s coping. Thanks HG. I wish more people were interested in Boris! I’d love one on him at the moment, although I suspect he doesn’t care a huge amount snd will carry on at No. 10 until it serves his purpose not to.

    What I don’t understand re Andrew is he is an UL and yet his narcissism is allowing some degree of control so he doesn’t lose residual benefits from the Queen? I wouldn’t have thought a lesser had that degree of control?

    1. WhoCares says:

      Alexissmith,

      “What I don’t understand re Andrew is he is an UL and yet his narcissism is allowing some degree of control so he doesn’t lose residual benefits from the Queen? I wouldn’t have thought a lesser had that degree of control?”

      I had similar thoughts and would love to hear more on this observation from HG!

      1. HG Tudor says:

        Explained in the video. Lessers still have some control, just not a large amount of it.

      2. Alexissmith2016 says:

        Ah. Pay attention Alexis and WC!

  6. lickemtomorrow says:

    Lots of interesting insights when it comes to narcissism there and also how it impacts in this high profile situation.

    First, the image. Andrew looks like he’s constipated and trying to take a massive crap (pardon the expression) 😛 He can’t get it out, not matter how hard he tries. Ohhh, the frustration, and the discomfort! I’m afraid he’s in for the enema, and it won’t be pleasant. The Queen has already inserted the hose as preparations are made to clear this massive load of shite one way or the other. She won’t be responsible for cleaning up the mess, having done her part in this unpleasant procedure. Now it is up to the Courts to provide the solution which is going to help empty the bowels of this Prince, and of course he will want to resist. His discomfort will be great, the pressure will be enormous, and the embarrassment of it all is unlikely to ever leave him. The result at finally getting it over and done with must necessarily provide relief … c’mon Andrew, you’ve been holding on for far too long and it’s time to finally rid yourself of that massive misdeed which you knew had to happen sooner or later. Justice will prevail, one hopes.

    Second, there appears to be no qualms about finally throwing Andrew under the bus on this one. It should still be a case of ‘innocent until proven guilty’, but the current action by the Monarchy seems to be an admission of his guilt, even if he’s not willing to admit it yet. It’s a ‘no questions asked’ type of scenario, which leaves no room for doubt either. It’s almost as if the Royal Family have declared him guilty … why bother with a Court case and possible trial? Washing their hands is not a good sign and I can imagine he is like a caged beast with no sense of escape from his current problems. It will be interesting to see how this plays out for all concerned in the long run. I foresee several more informative videos in the offing.

    Third, the Queen is due another Annus horribilis it seems, and during her Jubilee year, no less. Harry’s book/expose, Andrew’s trial, God only know what Harry’s wife has up her sleeve …

    It’s an endless saga, and none of it fit for a 95yr old woman, despite the fact she has aged so well.

    1. Truthseeker6157 says:

      LET,

      This tickled me. If I was Harry or Harry’s Wife, I’d be getting just a little bit twitchy that I might be next for the chop. It will be interesting to see if they suddenly attempt to make nice over the coming weeks.

      Xx

      1. lickemtomorrow says:

        TS 🙂

        The interesting thing about this is that Andrew has lost what Harry and his wife lost on their exit from the RF – their HRH titles. He is still currently Duke of York, as they are still Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Harry also lost his patronages and military titles. My impression is the Sussex’s will be rubbing their hands together, enjoying the downfall of Prince Andrew, especially Markle because of her narcissism. She won’t be fearful to see him taken down a notch or several, but gleeful is my guess. She certainly won’t look so bad having offered her own criticism of the RF, even if, for the most part, it was untruthful. If nothing else, it paints her in a better light, especially after winning her court case. I hope you can see where I am going with all this. This, to me, is more like a feather in the narcissist’s cap, even though she didn’t orchestrate his downfall. She will be gleefully watching on, feeling ‘vindicated’ again (post court case win), and there is a definite sense Andrew has been thrown under the bus, which the Harkle’s could probably relate to, but obviously feel no sympathy over as narc’s don’t do sympathy.

        I find Virginia Dufree’s all out assault on Prince Andrew interesting as well. It’s almost disconcerting in its ferocity, with words she has spoken in the last day or so indicative of her utter disgust and disdain for him. I’ve no problem with that, but she has said in her own words she is out to ‘destroy’ him, calling him arrogant and being determined to break him financially, if in no other way. Her vitriol seems to rest on his sense of arrogance, which appears to have fired up a real sense and need for justice in this case, but my guess is she has also been used and abused by many other men in the circumstances who have never been brought to justice and likely never will be. If she was forced to sleep with Prince Andrew under Epstein’s watch, who else was she forced to sleep with? Why are they not also being held to account? I may have read something indicating he is the only one who managed to slip through the net based on the previous deal she made, but there is a sense in me that Andrew has become the fall guy for her depraved experience at the hands of Epstein. I’m trying to take an objective view of her position based on her recent comments. She really wants to make him pay, but he was not the only culprit. Odd.

        Just to finish off, I think the Harkle’s will continue on their campaign to destroy the Monarchy. They are jealous, Harry is now demanding they are provided security in the UK rather than have to hire private security (which the Harkle’s will pay for apparently) and my heart sank at the thought they would even think of returning. The RF should have established a rigorous no contact regime to solve that problem. Unfortunately, they did not take advice from HG and so they will have to confront the ongoing saga Harry and his wife decide to inflict on them.

        I’m afraid the Queen’s Jubilee celebrations will be completely lost in the mix for now.

  7. Asp Emp says:

    Thank you, HG for this video. I had read some of the news about this story. When I read that the case would process through, I thought to myself, it is only right and just. Because of all the victims that were impacted by the overall ‘business’, no matter how much Andrew was involved, or not.

    Wow, even his HRH titles being ‘returned’ too, after letters of request being sent to the Palace and the resulting actions that followed. That says a lot. A lot.

    Very interesting to read your words, HG, as you say “and is defending this case as a private citizen”.

    The ‘typical’ tell-tale behaviours of his narcissism can be clearly seen should anyone watch the interview that took place in 2019. He’s looking down when he’s sat there “denying” things. The ‘avoidance’.

    “he will now be like a caged beast”. Absolutely. I have seen that in the Lesser I knew. Of course, he took it out on me.

    Your words “why does he not launch himself out there as a loose cannon quite simply his narcissism is ensuring this is kept in check it is quite unusual for a narcissist of his school” – he is not responding as we have seen a certain ex-President of USA had acted.

    The Queen is 95 years old and still such a strong-willed woman. God bless her. No doubt, she would also be strongly supported by people she has known for many years, ie friends from outside the family, including a small number of supporters within the family.

    Thank you, HG for this video. Thank you for continuing to highlight these people, especially those in higher ranks, supposedly trusted members of humanity who legally have a duty of care of the rest of the population. Boris is another one who is now in the public ‘spotlight’ too…..

    I have, yet, to see the word ‘narcissist’ attached to their names when it comes to the news being broadcast on tv, in the papers, in social media. I am reminded of your article as I write here ‘Why Can’t They See It Too?’.

    Kudos to you, HG, for doing all of this. Your Legacy grows and becomes more powerful 🙂

    1. Violetta says:

      I’m sneaking references to HG’s analysis I to DM comment sections any way I can. Putting them as a reply to a best or worst comment is a good way to make sure that they’ll be seen by many, but not so easy for trolls to find and have taken down as stand-alone comments.

      1. HG Tudor says:

        Much appreciated Violetta.

      2. Asp Emp says:

        Violetta, that is good to read, thank you for sharing that 🙂

  8. alexissmith2016 says:

    AAAAGHHHHHH so incredibly excited to listen! I cannot wait until they make a film about this. HG maybe you could write it

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.