Knowing the Narcissist : How To Handle the Narcissist At Court
This Logic Bulletin provides you with a considerable array of information about how you deal with the narcissist at a court hearing.
Whether it is recovering money or property, a hearing about child arrangements, dealing with divorce or a dispute over a boundary there is a significant chance you will end up in court at some point with a narcissist.
This bulletin enables you to understand the a huge amount about attending the court hearing where a narcissist is involved and includes the following:-
- How the narcissist will behave in court, broken down between the different schools of narcissist
- What the narcissist wants from the court hearing
- How the narcissist will behave towards you at a court hearing
- How the narcissist will use Lieutenants and The Coterie at a court hearing
- What you can do to maximise your prospects of success at the court hearing
- How you should handle the narcissist at the court hearing
- How the narcissist will try to hoover you at this court hearing
- Key considerations you need to understand with regard to your lawyer, court officials and court experts
- How you should conduct yourself in the court hearing
- The standard manipulations you can expect from the narcissist
- A series of practical steps and “Best practice” for you to use to not only succeed but to avoid increase anxiety and upset with regard to the process
- Plus much, much more.
This Logic Bulletin will save you thousands in legal fees, hours of wasted time and reduce and remove your fear, anxiety and stress. It is available for the low price of just US $ 20 and is the best investment you will ever make with regard to being involved with the narcissist at a court hearing. To obtain this insightful material, just use the link below to access immediately detailed audio material.
Ugh.
Do you consult with people, HG on how to deal with their own narc lawyer?
Because I currently have a narcissist lawyer and he makes me want to go back to self-representing – however, I think I might be out of my depth, legally speaking, in the upcoming “round”.
Yes.
Thank-you, HG. I will be emailing you.
WhoCares, sorry to read about the difficult lawyer.
“WhoCares, sorry to read about the difficult lawyer.”
Thanks Asp Emp. It’s okay (for now), following my last interaction with him, he and I (sorta) ended up on the same page – just in a really, painfully, tedious, roundabout manner. He kept flip-flopping, with regard to our legal strategy, in the most horrible way and, all the while, he was withholding information – as in, the actual position of the other side and their stance on certain matters. It was mind-boggling, but at least I could recognize why it was so. After an appointment with my new lawyer, I literally would be on the phone with my rl empath friend (who follows HG’s work), explaining the latest legal direction we were taking, and my lawyer would call me 5 minutes later telling me that he changed his mind.
And then, when I thought we had things “nailed down” (hah!), the discussion went something like this:
Me: “So, let me understand, yesterday we were going to do: A, B, C & D…and, today we are going to do this new plan of: 1, 2, 3 & 4?”
Lawyer: “It was all the same stuff we talked about yesterday.” (It wasn’t.)
Me: “And that stuff being..?” (Referencing my hand-written notes from both days.)
Lawyer: “Everything we just spoke about.”
Me: “What does your list look like? I just want to make sure I understood everything.”
Lawyer: “Oh, the whole nine yards.”
Me: “Thanks. Good talk.”
On a positive note, he did buy me some time – which, sometimes, with midrange narcs, is all you need. And my son hasn’t had to have visitation with his father going on close to a year now (not due to anything this lawyer did) – so, at least he continues be protected from his father.
But what a contrast to my past excellent lawyer (who I lost because he closed his private practice) – he would have laid it all out on the table, made certain that we were both on the same page *before* I left his office, and then would follow up with a comprehensive reporting letter that actually matched what we spoke of.