How the Narcissist Devalues Different Victims




This period of the narcissistic dynamic is regarded as always being part of the dynamic and understandably the worst part of it. Those who consider it as an ever present part of the dynamic however are over-stating its presence because whether devaluation appears at all and if it does, how it will manifest, depends very much on the nature of the dynamic with our appliances.

Commencing with the Tertiary Source, most of the time our engagements with Tertiary Sources do not include any devaluation. There are two main reasons for this :-

  1. The engagement is brief. We either engage with the Tertiary Source once, for a short time and never again or we engage with them repeatedly but it is only ever brief in nature; and
  2. The needs of the façade mean that engaging with the Tertiary Source in a benign way is the most effective method of proceeding.

It is the case however that Tertiary Sources are devalued. They will be insulted, ignored, triangulated with other superior-ranking sources. This devaluation may be because the Tertiary Source has ignited our fury (for instance a bar tender failing to serve us ahead of someone else) but the devaluation may just occur because we regard it as an expedient response. For instance, we see that it would draw amusement or admiration from our friends (Non Intimate Secondary Sources) if we pour scorn on a homeless person in the street or we insult the waitress in a bar. Neither of these people will have necessarily criticised us but we consider them expendable and by devaluing them we gain negative fuel from them and positive fuel from other sources.

Any devaluation of a Tertiary Source is short in duration. It is a burst of negative fuel but it is not hugely potent (indeed the admiration from the secondary or primary source which it brings about is more potent) when compared to other sources and the quantity of fuel provided is low. This is because the Tertiary Source will not be bound to us and therefore after a period of time of responding in a manner which provides this negative fuel the Tertiary Source more often than not will dis-engage.

The period of devaluation for a Tertiary Source may be less than a minute if they provide negative fuel and then back off. Of course if they continue to engage us and provide Challenge Fuel, we will keep provoking them and also asserting our perceived superiority over them in order to put them in their place. We also of course cannot have some upstart Tertiary source making us look bad in front of other superior sources. We are unlikely to keep ‘pursuing’ the Tertiary Source. Thus, if we upbraid a waiter and he retreats to the kitchen, we are unlikely to follow him and keep the devaluation going. Instead, we take the negative fuel from his angry reaction and let him withdraw. We consider it largely beneath us to keep pressing such an individual. Of course, if the waiter returns to us, we will devalue again and keep doing so for as long as he keeps appearing in front of us.

It is unlikely that the Tertiary Source will be smeared as a consequence of this devaluation because ultimately within our fuel matrix the Tertiary Source is not of significant importance and therefore it is not worth expending the energy and time on smearing them.

We may see this Tertiary Source on another occasion and provoke them again or we may engage with them in a benign fashion. It does not matter to us how we treated them on the previous interaction because of the way we compartmentalise.

In respect of secondary sources, devaluation does occur but if and when it does, it is for a reason which is directly linked to the behaviour of the secondary source.

If someone is a non-intimate secondary source, therefore they are a family member, friend or colleague, they will usually enjoy an elongated golden period. Devaluation of the secondary source will only occur where that individual has sought to expose us, challenge us extensively or has turned off the fuel supply completely. The devaluation will be longer than that of the Tertiary Source because the secondary source will be bound more closely to us. This binding will be as a consequence of the nature of the relationship – the person is in our social circle with other people, they work with us or they are in our family circle – but also because we will have put more effort into binding them to us. Accordingly, the secondary source is less likely to withdraw in the same way that a Tertiary Source would. Instead, the secondary source is more likely to want to try to find out why they are being treated this way, to seek to make amends and to gain our favour once again. Sometimes this devaluation occurs as a consequence of needing to send a signal to other secondary sources that they ought not to cross us so that they realise it is preferable to remain loyal to us than cross us in some way.

The secondary source who is devalued is likely to be smeared by us. We will want other secondary sources of the same circle or ilk to turn against the devalued secondary source and complete their isolation and to ostracise them. We are conscious of the maintenance of the façade and therefore we will look to present a reason for why this secondary source has fallen from favour, is no longer invited, is not welcome at certain gatherings and so forth.

The period of devaluation for a secondary source varies in terms of the actual engagement and the period over which the person is regarded as ‘black’. If the secondary source wants to talk to us to find out why they are treated this way, we will keep devaluing them so this might be a matter of minutes or a couple of hours. If they remain proximate to us and keep providing negative fuel, we will keep devaluing and provoking them. If they retreat and try to engage us on another occasion, they will remain ‘black’ until they do something (or there is an external act) which causes us to regard them as ‘white’ and we welcome them to the fold again. For instance, if the secondary source seeks forgiveness and has a residual benefit we want, we will extend our graciousness to admit them into the relevant circle again. If we see no purpose, other than negative fuel, then they remain painted ‘black’ and they will be dis-engaged from and we will find a replacement for them soon enough.

In some instances the secondary source may dis-engage and have nothing more to do with us, thus a friend never socialises with us, the family member withdraws or the colleague moves workplaces or department. Sometimes they may not have such an option and instead they remain in effect a scapegoat for us, remaining ‘black’ for years and are devalued further each time there is any interaction with us. Thus, every time there is a family gathering they will be subject to contemptuous comments, triangulation or silent treatments. Of course, this long-lasting devaluation may be intermittent as we may only see this secondary source at certain events or places. Similar to the tertiary source we will rarely keep seeking out the secondary source to devalue him or her.

Where the secondary source is of an intimate variety, either an IPSS or DSIPSS, then the dynamic alters. There are two potential forms of devaluation.

The first is used as a corrective measure to bring the IPSS or DSIPSS back into line. Thus devaluation and dis-engagement is not a certainty but instead, if the IPSS or DSIPSS responds favourably to this ‘warning’ then the devaluation will halt and the golden period continues. This is because the IPSS or DSIPSS’s fuel is regarded as still valuable and not stale and devaluation is used because they are not complying as they ought to do. This corrective devaluation brings them back into line and thus the corrective devaluation halts.

The second is where the IPSS or DSIPSS does not respond to the warning and thus their failure and treachery means that he or she must now be punished as we head towards dis-engagement. The devaluation in this instance will be more intense than the corrective devaluation but it will not last for long because either the IPSS or DSIPSS stays out of our way or if they do not, we want to turn to a different IPSS or DSIPSS (or find a new one) and therefore dis-engagement comes along quickly.

Finally there is the IPPS. The Intimate Partner Primary Source is the person who suffers the longest devaluation, the harshest devaluation and is the one which is recognised by most people. This happens because

  1. You promised to be The One. Your failure to live up to our ideals mean you must be punished, we are not going to let you off the hook easily;
  2. Your negative fuel is potent, plentiful and frequent and therefore we want to keep drawing that from you;
  3. This negative fuel also provides contrast and the motivation for our seduction of your potential replacement;
  4. You are bound to us and therefore you are far less likely to withdraw from us. This binding is both emotional and non-emotional. Emotionally it arises because you want to return to the golden period, you want to make everything alright, you are a love devotee and want to have love triumph, you may well be co-dependent, you do not want to admit defeat and you are addicted to us. The non-emotional are matters such as finances, children, house, family pressures and so forth. The combination of these factors means that you cling to us and because you most likely live with us your devaluation occurs each day;
  5. We grant you Respite Periods. This takes place within the umbrella of the Devaluation Period and means that you are given renewed hope (so you stick around) and also it means your potential for becoming numbed and unresponsive is reduced by these periods which allow you to gather some strength again;
  6. The IPPS may be the only person in our fuel matrix who is being devalued and this will usually take place behind closed doors to preserve the façade so there is less likelihood of external interference which will disrupt the devaluation.

The devaluation of the IPPS is the most brutal of all the devaluations of appliances, it continues for the longest, it can be years, even decades in some instances and within this devaluation comes a whole host of manipulations and abuses which cover the emotional, the financial, the sexual and the physical.


The Knowledge Vault

The Books of HG Tudor

Audio Consultations

11 thoughts on “How the Narcissist Devalues Different Victims

  1. Asp Emp says:

    When people are reading on this blog, they initially may only view it from their immediate ‘ensnarement(s) / entanglement(s) but may be not necessarily recognising that it could be spilling out outside these immediate(s).

    As I progressed through my learning on KTN, after a period of time, I was able to think about the narcissists at work.

    Having said that – I saw a comment that HG wrote earlier today – in relation to narcissists (whether aware or not aware of their own narcissism) doing this to other narcissists. The higher-ups at work were continuously asserting control, at varying levels of ‘intensity’, using different methods whether directly or indirectly – sometimes via ‘traingulation’ with other colleagues or via emails. Appalling, absolutely appalling at this organisation! And, I take absolute great pleasure in sharing now – that the higher-ups couldn’t even use proper grammar when it came to writing / wording emails when communicating with outside organisations, especially when it involved obtaining funding !! The higher-ups RELY on staff working at lower levels to write reports etc. No, the narcissists at work were dip-shits, absolute thicker than two planks. LOL, for some reason, Frank Spencer sprang into my mind….. LOL. I think it is a sign of my LT / ET being in a better sync if I can laugh and view the past narcissists in such a derogatory manner (smirking with pleasure).

  2. Kiki says:

    Hi everyone

    Just wondering does anyone else feel this way .
    I’m not sure if it’s ET or what .
    I feel I have become bitter and cynical since my relationship with Narc.
    I used to be very soft and gentle, and I’ve noticed a hardness come into me that makes me feel protected but heavy inside.
    I don’t trust easily , and have a very low tolerance of people and their BS.
    I don’t want to become a bitter cynical single woman , it shows I think .
    I have lost ALL interest in sex , feeling sexy , even associating with it .It’s just to emotionally painful .
    I feel like I’ve lost a part of myself that was happy .
    I was reading the law of attraction, as a scientist I know it’s rubbish , but I feel my vibrations are low and that’s what I’m attracting right now.
    I’ve had issues with a colleague, at this stage I don’t know if it’s me or her.I don’t trust her or anyone tbh.
    I just feel off .
    Has anyone else felt like this ?


    1. Asp Emp says:

      Kiki, I read your comment and was able to recognise what you are saying here. It is good that you can recognise the points that you listed. You are basically describing what I experienced over a number of years. I can state that, from my point of view (and my own personal experiences) that it is your ET, eroded emotional empathy and depression that I am seeing in your words here.

      Increasing your logical thinking and using the knowledge on KTN blog will help you reduce your ET. In time, your eroded emotional empathy will also reduce and so will your depression. When all this has taken place within yourself (your individual ‘re-programming’ = your ‘rediscovery of who are are), which will take time, but you will get there – you will find that you will feel more ‘peaceful’ within your emotions and mental processes. Give it time and continue with the path you have taken – absorb the learning, use it to ‘re-program’ your thoughts and emotions. HG’s methods work, his work works – some empaths on KTN blog have made the journey and reached the point where HG envisaged his aims for people like you to also achieve. Give it time, Kiki, you have the strength to do it 🙂

    2. A Victor says:

      Hi Kiki,
      I felt dazed after my ex left. Since then, 11 years ago, I have come to understand how naive I have been. It made me sad to be taken advantage of, as well as bewildered that people do that, which did have the effect of making me distrusting and therefore I pulled away from most people. Until I arrived here. Now I am excited because I now understand how I inadvertently opened the door to those who would hurt me, I understand about them also, and I now know that it doesn’t have to be this way, I can protect myself while remaining true to myself at the same time. I have gained a confidence I did not previously have and, armed with my new knowledge, I have taken steps to reduce the impact, prior and ongoing, of narcissists on my life. But it is a strength, not a bitterness, a relief, not heavy. I hope as you are away from your narcissist you will find the same us true for you. Best wishes Kiki and thank you for this question.

    3. MP says:

      Hello Kiki, I haven’t been in a romantic ensnarement but I experienced some of what you described after most narc entanglements. I think that it is healthy and an awakening that not everyone is to be trusted. I will never be the same person that I used to be and I accept that and grateful for the lessons. I am able to enjoy my life because I’m at the point where the narcissists are irrelevant to me now. And I’m also at the point that I know not everyone is to be mistrusted because I have been able to keep my interactions with people that are healthy and safe. Just take your time and don’t force yourself in interactions that do not make you feel safe. Time will tell if you’re right or not about them but what matters is you’re giving yourself time to heal. Just do a lot of self love/ self care and focus on yourself as you heal.

  3. leelasfuelstinks says:

    I remember: It was terrible! It was a living nightmare. All those tears, I don´t know how many tears I cried back then 😭 It all started with a 3 week Silent Treatment. I just greeted a friend of us, friendly. That wounded him. Boom! Three weeks of Silent Treatment. Then respite period. We moved in together and I worked very hard. One Friday evening I had to work longer which lead to a tremendous lash out with Threatened Loss. He threatened to kick me out instantly! Somehow I could hide my tears at work and finish my to dos for that day. Sometimes I cried all night and went to work with eyes full of tears. Sucked it up and did my work. He used to lash out in the night. After a hard day at work came the cruel verbal put-downs in the evening and at night. He sometimes didn´t let me sleep and I had to get up next morning every early.

    After three months I knew, this relationship won´t last. The respite periods, the hope that those terrible lash outs will stop and the fact that it was very difficult to find another flat kept me in there. After 6 months I only stayed in there because of my job. I had a 1 year limited contract and I wanted to finish that year before I move to another city. The lash-outs and put downs became worse and worse. One fine evening, after a particularly brutal and cruel verbal put-down and a Threatened Loss I decided: This is it!

    I prepared my departure secretly (while he was sleeping) and the next day I asked for a serious talk (didn´t know anything about NPD back then). I told him that this is it, that this relationship won´t work out and that I decided to end it. Took my stuff, said goodbye and walked out of the door for good.

    1. BC30 says:

      You’re pretty fucking fierce 💜

      1. leelasfuelstinks says:

        Of course I am! 😉 Why shouldn´t I? 😉 After almost a year being treated like shit!

        I didn´t know that he had NPD, I didn´t know anything about Cluster B disorders but I figured that this relationship could never ever work out and that we just don´t match. So many arguments, so much drama, it was logic and clear that this would not last. The reason I told him why I left was that “we do not match and I see no future together”. This was honest! There was no H.G. Tudor back then unfortunately. I didn´t know “Once you know, you go, you get out and you stay out”. I saw that exactly the way I described: We do not match, there cannot be a future together.

        1. A Victor says:

          You were wise Leela.

  4. Tanya says:

    If the dirty little secret has been disengaged, will a Hoover take place or is that it and the narcissist is now gone forever?

    1. HG Tudor says:

      1. It is unusual for the DLS to be disengaged from.
      2. If disengagement has taken place, there remains a risk of being hoovered. The narcissist is NOT gone forever.

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.