But I Can Change


“But I can change.”

A phrase so often said by some of our kind. You will, more likely than not, have heard this sentence at some point during your entanglement with us. Usually it is uttered as part of a Preventative Hoover when the narcissist sees that there is a considerable risk that you are going to depart the Formal Relationship and in so doing threaten the provision of fuel from the chief source. It also makes an appearance as part of the Initial Grand Hoover to draw you back in, should you have managed to take those first steps towards escape. You will hear it in Benign Follow-Up Hoovers although following the effluxion of time you are more likely to hear the cousin, namely, “But I have changed.” Occasionally it appears within the devaluation phase, following an unpleasant episode as part of the further manipulation to keep you bound to the narcissist and providing fuel. Accordingly, its use will occur at different parts of the narcissistic dynamic.

To some, the sentence contains the magical words that the empath is waiting to hear. The empath’s inherent desire to fix, to heal and to repair longs for that acknowledgement by the narcissist that they can alter their behaviour, make new and fresh choices, learn from the mistakes and choose a better path. The declaration of a willingness to change is welcomed by certain empaths and they selflessly accept this statement, believing that all people have some good within, that it is a case of recognising this and applying a different approach.

To others, the words are welcomed but with caution. Perhaps the devaluing behaviour has been so deep and savage that the recipient is wary, fearful of their hopes being raised too soon. Their inherent desire to see change, for the good of both people in the relationship wants to agree, to grab this offer with both hands and see to its implementation, but dare they hope that it can be done? Indeed they can, for in that moment, as the cool, hard logic of caution makes its presence felt, it becomes overrun by the soaring emotional thinking that cries out – “He has realised. He knows he has done wrong. He wants to make amends. He wants to change.” The emotional thinking brings forth those twin sisters of pressure – Hope and Guilt. The empath, chained to the concept of hope, sincerely wishes that  the person that they love will change and become a better person. Guilt also weighs in, whispering, “What if it is genuine, what if he can change and you do not give him a chance, what a bad person you will be for doing that?” The emotional thinking will win out.

Rarely will this protestation of being able to change go unheeded. Rarely will the opportunity not be given to the narcissist who states that this can be done. It is only the informed, those who can apply their cool, hard logic and resist the rising tide of emotional thinking who can repel the allure of those enticing words. For everyone else, they are drawn into allowing the narcissist a further opportunity to keep they, the victim, in place.

Yet, who is it of our brethren who issues this plea? What is meant by it and can it really happen?

You will rarely hear it from the Lesser Narcissist. He sees no reason to change. He or she does as they want. If he smashed up the house or physically attacked you, well it was your fault that it happened and once the ignited fury has abated, the best you will get is that the reset button is pressed and nothing is said about the previous behaviour. The statement of change might be issued if the Lesser faces a fuel crisis and in absolute desperation it is blurted out in order to prevent the cessation of his primary supply but come the morning after, the intention will have evaporated and any suggestion of change will be rejected. The crisis has been averted, the wound healed and fury abated and the entitled Lesser is not going to make those changes, not when of course it was your fault ll along.

If reminded of his intention, he will brush it to one side, telling you he will look into it, that he is busy with something else at the moment but you can talk later, that he has to go to work, that he has someone to see and you will be left dangling. He will not return to the discussion about making a change or seeking help and fearing a further explosive episode you do not press further and there the matter is left.

You will rarely hear it from the Greater Narcissist. He sees no reason to change either. Oh, we know what we do but that is borne out of necessity and it is what must be done. Our needs, superior to yours, require this behaviour and if you cannot accept it, well we can easily find someone else who will, because, after all, we are the prize, the champion and the ultimate, so it is your loss. The Greater will not issue this plea as a Preventative Hoover or such like to stop you leaving. True, he will not want his primary source to escape. This is a matter of fuel provision but often more of pride and superiority. After all, the extensive fuel matrices of the Greater school ( see The Fuel Matrix – Part Three ) means that even if the primary source had the audacity to escape he has plenty of other sources to turn to in the meanwhile. He will however not want to suffer the wounding of this primary source escaping and will want to stop it, but he will use charm and threat to achieve this, not the plea that he will change. It is beneath him.

The only time you might hear these words uttered by the Greater Narcissist is purely because he sees the opportunity for more Machiavellian behaviours through manipulating his victim by engendering false hope. He will see the opportunity to increase his trade craft through agreeing to engage in therapy. He will see it not as a chance to change, but rather an opportunity to learn more about himself (and why not, since he is such a fascinating creature), understand more about his ways and indeed take on the challenge of therapists and the like. If he agrees to changing his behaviour and enlisting external advice and assistance he will also lay down terms and conditions for this occurring in order to further his own agenda. You will however never hear the Greater Narcissist use the phrase “But I can change” as part of some desperate plea.

Accordingly, this leaves us with the school which uses this manipulation often, far more often than the other schools and that is of course the Mid Range Narcissist.  The Mid Ranger uses this manipulation for the following reasons:-

  1. He sees him or herself as a good person. Their perspective means they genuinely regard themselves as decent people and therefore since they are decent, they will, well, do the decent thing and look at making a change;
  2. They regard themselves as giving and they are prepared to make that sacrifice if it means saving the relationship;
  3. They consider themselves to be something of a tortured soul, they have “their demons”, there is something eating away at them and they wish to address it;
  4. They need to be saved and you are the person who can save them. They lack the pig-headed arrogance of the Lesser or the sneering superiority of the Greater.

What is behind those driving factors?

  1. The narcissistic perspective. They consider themselves the one who does good and it is other people who cause the problems, but because they are SO good they will prove that by addressing the issues which have been raised. This is not because they actually believe there is something wrong with them in terms of culpability but rather it is actually an opportunity for them to show the world that they are good and it is other people who are the problem.
  2. This is the victim perspective coming to the fore. The world is a horrible place and no matter how much they try to help others, the world keeps trying to bring them down but that doesn’t matter because guess what? They will rise above it and they will be the one who takes one for the team, who makes the sacrifice and does so for the greater good.
  3. This is the victim perspective once again. They do not see that they are disordered. They do not recognise that they manipulate. They are incapable of doing so because they have no insight or awareness. They do however regard this whole concept of being a ‘tortured soul’ as a magnificent device for drawing fuel. Sympathy, concern and compassion all come flowing. This is not an acknowledgement that there is anything wrong with the Mid Ranger but rather he blames ‘the demon’ (whatever that might be) because blame-shifting is a key defence mechanism and blaming you, the neighbours, the weather or an intangible concept will all work for him.
  4. This is the victim perspective once more but also all part of the sympathy grab for attention. The Mid Ranger wishes to draw pity and compassion but then also be revered, for he is the fallen hero who has been saved and is then able to rise once more, in the magical thinking that plays out in his mind.

The Middle Mid Ranger and Upper Mid Ranger have sufficient cognitive function to realise that their behaviour causes a problem. This is where many victims (understandably) are fooled into thinking that the narcissist is actually showing insight (indeed this often causes them to either think that the narcissist is not a narcissist, or that he is but he can actually change) . The MMR or UMR may acknowledge that his actions cause hurt and problems, however, he or she will never accept ownership of the hurt and problems. For instance, they might say,

“I know that when I disappear for a few days you are worried sick, BUT I need space because you are always pestering me.”

“I understand that you are hurt when I say certain things BUT I am under pressure at work at the moment and you aren’t helping when you question me about why I am home late.”

They can see the consequence but they will not own the consequence. They are configured not to do so.

As is always the case, the uninformed victim accepts the third party explanation as the cause of the errant behaviour or self-flagellates and the victim blames him or herself. So the cause of the problem is regarded as pressure at work or the pestering of the victim.

The Mid Ranger will state he can change and moreover he will also act on the declaration which again sows the seeds of false hope and ensures the victim remains in situ and providing fuel. This is just a further part of the manipulation.

The Mid-Ranger may become more attentive, does not dole out silent treatments, removes the manipulations and stops sulking for a few weeks. This is a Respite Period and he has implemented this because when you said you would not leave, you became painted white again because you did what he wanted. You succumbed to his control and your gracious behaviour provided fuel. The golden period returns and this is what powers his altered ways. It is not because there is any recognition that he must change because it hurts you. The alteration is because you have done what he wanted, thus his split thinking makes you ‘white’ once more and this is what keeps the devaluation at bay, but only for a while.

Naturally, the unwitting victim, having seen changes effected (but not knowing the real reason behind them) is conned into thinking that these changes can happen again and therefore when the plea “But I can change” is made at a later time, the victim is swamped by hope because it happened before (thus it can surely happen again) and thus the cycle continues.

If you return to the Formal Relationship through an Initial Grand Hoover or a Benign Follow-Up Hoover you are painted white once more and the golden period returns, creating the illusion of changed behaviours. Until it tarnishes in due course.

The insidious manipulative manner of the Mid Ranger means that these changes come in many forms. He will alter his actions at home. He will cease the affair shelving the IPSS as your Respite Period Golden Period draws him back to you. He will help out, he will show that inkling of charm once again. He will of course herald his new-found redemption to third parties because this will garner fuel and maintain the facade and of course accords with his complete conviction that he is a good person. This will also provide him with ammunition to hurl at you at the appropriate time, in that he made the changes and if things have faltered it has to be your fault then.

The Mid Ranger will readily attend therapy sessions. This allows him to do several things:-

  1. Show you he is willing and a good person;
  2. He can maintain the facade, “Dawn wanted me to go to therapy and because I love her so much it was the least I could do.” (now tell me how wonderful a husband I am).
  3. He will use the therapy sessions to advance his own agenda. Often the victim will not know what is discussed owing to confidentiality. Therefore the Mid-Ranger, convinced of his own goodness and lack of culpability, will manipulate the therapist  (and will do so convincingly most of the time). Thereafter, the Mid Ranger will tell the victim that actually the therapist said that the victim is the abuser and that the narcissist is the victim. This might be true, an exaggeration of the observations of the unwitting therapist or a lie. Either way, this will leave the victim undermined such is the conviction of the narcissist. Ally that with the fact the victim has seen some changes, their own eroded self-worth and reduced critical thinking and it comes as no surprise that the victim is confused or even believes what the narcissist is saying.
  4. The narcissist can hold it over the victim. “I did as you asked and got some help. They told me there is no issue.” (Now you owe me and I am going to ensure I extract that debt from you repeatedly).

The desire to change is motivated by entirely different reasons than you realise and this desire is not genuine. The change is short-lived, never permanent and any and all behaviours associated with it, no matter how genuine they appear, no matter how earnest the pleading, no matter how many tears are spilled (and the Mid Ranger will turn on the waterworks) it is all part of the manipulation.

They cannot and will not change.

Grasp that understanding so that when you hear “But I can change”, cool,hard logic prevails and you resist the allure of hope. People are inherently optimistic. Empathic people even more so, but the dark side of this hope is vulnerability and our kind and in particular the Mid-Ranger count on that and exploit it.

27 thoughts on “But I Can Change

  1. VC says:

    I am still recovering from all of the abuse (emotional and physical), that was inflicted upon me by Anouar Allati. I am 2 days away from my 1 year due date. I have been grieving about the loss of the baby, but could not imagine raising a child with a lying, stealing, drugging, abusing, psychopath. I am still in a lot of pain during this time, but know that once May 1 is behind me, I can keep moving forward in my recovery. The last time we got back together he had condoms in his bag and admitted going to prostitutes. He was also texting some 20 year old girl to “hang out”. Emails from transvestites. This was my norm What a sad human being. Just have to take care of myself. <3

  2. MV says:

    Anouar is a con man. He had set qorh hollers. He abused me while pregnant. Stole money. Had contact with transvestites. Constantly had teenage girls in his phone to stroke his ego. He does a ton of drugs, claiming to be a Muslim. He hangs out with losers and they rob people. Really, these NPD animals belong at the zoo with the rest of the animals. It seems like that’s where they were raised, right?! The zoo!

    1. HG Tudor says:

      I know you did not mean for it to read this way, but it seems as if you are suggesting that in order to claim to be a Muslim one must do a ton of drugs!

  3. M.V.C. says:

    YES! My ex abuser would do all of these things. Then he would apologize and promise change, and I would fall right back into the cycle of him texting and messaging every girl under the sun (dating back 10 years), stealing money, lying about the time he spent with criminals, telling me that I was not living a good “Muslim” lifestyle and I was a bad influence on him AFTER I even converted! Everything with Anouar el Allati was completely backwards. He made my life and absolute nightmare, and I am thankful that I have been able to find myself and my voice again. I just need to make sure he doesn’t hurt me and be aware of my surroundings. He always said if I spoke out, he would do something to me. I even found emails from a shemale! Anouar Allati is so sick and scary. I pray things will turn out well, Inshallah.

    1. J says:

      My situation has… similarities. I hope you kept those emails as well as his parents’ contact info. If he messes with you, that would make for one POWERFUL disincentive for him. My plan of last resort has… similarities.
      BTW Way to say his name loud and proud!

  4. Diva says:

    “But I Can Change”…….oh you can change alright…..no problem there…..you initially change from good to bad to worse…… and then you change beyond all recognition to the person we originally met and then back again…….the only real question is who are you going to be today?……..Diva

  5. NarcAngel says:

    Why should anybody have to change? Think how we feel when anyone suggests that of us. When someone shows you who they are you have choices: accept them completely as they are (without any hidden agenda of hope) or check out one of the other billions of people available instead of forcing this one to bend to your will and your idea of an acceptable mate. After all-isnt that what they do to us and we hate them for it?

    Narcs dont have to change. Empaths do if they want to be happy.

    1. Windstorm2 says:

      Very true. Took me an awfully long time to understand this, but goodness knows I dont want to change to fit someone else’s desires, so why should they change to fit mine.

    2. Tappan Zee says:

      NA. nice work.
      needed that.
      on point.

  6. Lisa says:

    They never change. Ever.
    Its a true case of ‘fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me’.
    Ya just have to give up the hope thats its ever going to happen.

  7. PEEKAY says:

    This is the exact manipulation my mid-range narc used in his initial grand Hoover to keep me around…it worked. He told me he needed to change and seek therapy because he realized his behaviors hurt people. His IPPS had tried to kill herself over him (broken appliance?) and he was clearly trying to promote me to replace her. Now he has disengaged from me but wants to keep me around as a demoted IPSS (or more like a DLS) while he spends all of his time with his shiny new IPPS. At best, I was a temporary IPPS for about a year and a half until he could find a more suitable replacement. It hurts and yet I still have trouble escaping or wanting to….:(

  8. Tappan Zee says:

    You cannot change.
    You will not change.
    We can change.
    Or stop trying.
    To change.
    For YOU.
    We r ok.
    As is.

  9. Scout says:

    Thank you for this HG, very accurate description of my UMR. Just one difference; he has never said to me he can or will change. Is this his self-assured arrogance, or is it so there is no culpability on his part when devaluation/disengagement takes place?

    1. HG Tudor says:

      He clearly uses an alternative method of exerting control so has no need to adopt the ‘But I Can Change’ approach.

      1. Scout says:

        Thank you.

  10. kq says:

    Well there it is. Depressing but glad to now know.

  11. JC says:

    I went through this often. Now I know why- besides, mine was always going to quit drinking. (Along with all the other bad habits). He cut back in the amount, but never did totally. As a true alcoholic he would hide it from me. He tried to convince me he was trying to quit when we split and acted like he is now clean and sober because he has a child. Some how I doubt this statement…

  12. Sillyolperson says:

    Dear Mr Tudor,

    The only thing that changes is their mask! 🎭

    Excellent article

  13. Peaceful says:

    HG, a lifetime of gratitude for showing me that is an impossibility!

    1. HG Tudor says:

      You are welcome. Kudos to you for grasping it.

  14. Cathrine says:

    That’s really interesting. I’m struggling with putting a label or a school to my ex Narcissist because it would in a way help me to understand more.

    He’s had a dysfunctional childhood for sure. His father bullied his mother a lot in his own words, and he was always made to feel unloved, inadequate, not deserving of attention, uncared for by his father, his mother despite the abuse always siding with his father. He grew up to hate his father vehemently, not wanting to be like him, still always trying to impress him to finally get his approval, never ever succeeding of course.

    I’ve never heard him use the term narcissist of either his father, or of himself, but he wouldn’t surely. But he grew up to be his father in so many ways and he ticks almost all the boxes for being a narcissist. I won’t recount all these here.

    He’s smart though, clever, intelligent, he’s highly successful, but underneath it all I could always sense his primitive aggression, his cold fury. His favourite method of punishment always was the passive aggressive silent treatment at which he excels, but he did physically abuse me once, loosing control of himself completely. He doesn’t think anything is wrong with him at all, he sees himself as a good person victimised all the time by everyone in his life who betrays him and forever lets him down. He doesn’t trust anyone at all. He doesn’t see for himself the similarities with his father. He can’t keep anyone in his life, he argues with everyone, he has mood swings, he projects a lot. And he’s a master at blaming everyone else of course. He is not the man who would ever promise to change in a hoover or any other time.

    I would think from this that he would be a Lesser or a Mid Ranger? All instinct and no cognitive realisation of what he is or of what he does.

    But the thing is, he really likes power games, and in that case I know that the manipulative ways of his are conscious, he knows what he’s doing. He even enjoys it, relishes it. He uses it in business to confuse clients, he uses it with friends and people close to him in arguments, he’s told me and even showed me in texts lots of times how excellent he is at this. So in this case he knows what he’s doing.

    Anyone? What do you make of it? HG?

  15. Mona says:

    All true. I completely agree.

  16. J says:

    Mic drop ending! It is one the hardest and most crucial things to understand about Ns. Cannot change, will not change. (I actually asked a question very like this on another post. Thank you for a detailed, unwavering and definitive answer!)

  17. gabbanzobean says:

    My mid-range frequently rolled out the tortured soul pity party. It was, ironically, about how he despite all his valiant efforts in trying, he still cannot change. “I am so depressed and withdrawn because I keep trying to be faithful to my wife and I keep failing at it because my willpower is weak.”

    Would they ever stop to think that maybe they can control this “willpower”? Or is the Greater the only type of narc who can exert such control? In this instance I am referring to “sex” as the weakness as this is the vice of my narc. He cannot resist sex. And while he does not go around raping people or drugging their wine, he will have sex with anyone who is willing to give it to him. And he blames his willpower that makes him unable to resist which makes him “weak”.

    Is it that he primarily gets most his fuel from sex alone? Or is the “willpower” thing a blanket excuse? I know there can be many addictions. Food, gambling, drugs, etc. Sex seems to be his addiction.

    Also, if a mid-range narc does not know what he is, why does he mirror us? How can you mirror someone and not realize you are mirroring them? I hope my question makes sense.

    1. HG Tudor says:


      1. Abc says:

        Can you take awY my name please. The women Meliisa vergibia cahir is bi polar and she is writing this things breaking my privacy. You letting it here on ur page is also a crime. Delete the concept MVC wrote ty.

  18. kimmichaud1 says:

    Mine never said this because he’s never admitted to being wrong I’m sure he’s not a lessor though and I don’t think he’s a greater I think it’s cut I always overlooked things so he didn’t have the need

Vent Your Spleen! (Please see the Rules in Formal Info)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous article

Back For More

Next article

Ex Machina